Hi Jeremy
In fact I did not notice the new icon between the other inverted ones:
If anyone is interested in exploring alternatives (Thomas?), I’d welcome
> any proposals:
>
> https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/TiddlyFox/tree/master/data/images
>
In case I would find some time (which will not be
Hi Jeremy,
> we need a clear transition between different shapes, not just different
> colours.
>
Perhaps. I would suggest we use *just Jack *and some colours and where it
makes sense, some overlay or posture that indicates a status, e.g.
-
*plain *could just be Jack,
in classic blue
If you are collecting promises about multiple users environment it is on the
road map of NoteSelf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 2:38:16 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> They are not officially released yet, mostly because they need a bit more
> tweaking, at least the familytree which is the one closest to what you
> might want.
>
>- http://listtree.tiddlyspot.com/
>-
Hi Mat
> @Jeremy - would it make sense to make PRs for these?
Neat, by the way. Always surprising what can be done with CSS.
In what form would you suggest making the PRs? I’d love to have a “family tree”
edition in the core, but of course we’d need the author to commit to
maintaining it.
>
Ah, found this too. Another variant, while at it. (...If I didn't make a
list of all my stuff I would completely forget things even exist.)
http://boxes.tiddlyspot.com/
<:-)
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 2:38:16 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> IF what you're asking for merely is a visual
IF what you're asking for merely is a visual representation, not a
generation of a tree, then maybe these are of help?
They are not officially released yet, mostly because they need a bit more
tweaking, at least the familytree which is the one closest to what you
might want.
-
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 4:26:41 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>
> we need a clear transition between different shapes, not just different
> colours.
>
That's right. Colour is not enough.
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
