Do note I found these alternate small braces that may be better.
﹙₍ ₎﹚
Regards
Tony
On Saturday, 31 October 2020 12:01:43 UTC+11, TonyM wrote:
>
> Mario,
>
> I would be keen to see these additional inline glyphs made available. They
> look like a fusion of [ ] and ( )
>
> It would be ideal for
Mario,
I would be keen to see these additional inline glyphs made available. They
look like a fusion of [ ] and ( )
It would be ideal for mark-up that involves links or buttons and where the
content is considered a title.
*A line with〖 This inline 〗and more
- They also look good when no
Question,
If other glyphs and characters could be selected could we actually redefine
existing mark-up with customise?
\customise glyph="*" parameters
*This would then take on the new definition here?
I raise this because this us what the current double underscore is
effectively doing.
An
Mario,
Just for clarification the double underscore (not underscore) is used, does
this not clash with its existing use?, or is this intentional?
It is available on most keyboards.
Regards
Tony
On Saturday, 31 October 2020 00:55:25 UTC+11, PMario wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to discuss
Mario,
I think it would be useful to include such "compound customisations" with
the plugin or at lest on the plugins website. Although perhaps it could be
an optional item that requires tagging.
Having used html tables within wikitext for so long, I find it easier to
follow a html table
Hi folks,
I'd like to discuss with you the table syntax as shown in
\customize tick=table _element=table _endString="/endTable" _mode=block
\customize tick=caption _element=caption
\customize tick=! _element=th
\customize tick=cell _element=td _classes=".hl"
\customize tick _use=cell
Mario,
Go how you want, but my understanding comes from the more "modern use"
noted later in the Wikipedia entry, truthfully a leading one may confuse me
ans many others given this;
*The pilcrow is used in desktop publishing software
>
