Coming back around to this after a bit.
I think the best way to preserve backwards compatibility is to setup a new
text-reference field-name prefix.
!! = tiddler field-name reference
## = data tiddler index-name reference
What would a good doubled-char prefix be for 'nested json data-tiddler
Is there some reason ## can't used again? And how about strict "[[...]]"
and '[[...]]' for arrays?
{
a: {
b: {
c: {
x: 5,
y: "six",
z: "[[7, "eight"]
}
}
}
}
-> "a##b##c##x", 'a##b##c##z"[[0]]"' etc.
--
You received this message because you
