Re: [twdev] [TW5] Transclusion: {{tiddler||template}} - Why || and not |?
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014 19:22:47 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: Hi Stephan Why do we have double pipes for seperating the tiddler title from the template in the transclusion rule? Because I used the single pipe to separate ??? Is there something missing? This sentence does not parse to well in my small german brain ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWikiDev group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [twdev] [TW5] Transclusion: {{tiddler||template}} - Why || and not |?
Sorry Stephan I pressed send too early - still drafting the rest of the reply :) Best wishes Jeremy On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Stephan Hradek stephan.hra...@gmail.comwrote: Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014 19:22:47 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: Hi Stephan Why do we have double pipes for seperating the tiddler title from the template in the transclusion rule? Because I used the single pipe to separate ??? Is there something missing? This sentence does not parse to well in my small german brain ;) -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWikiDev group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [twdev] [TW5] Transclusion: {{tiddler||template}} - Why || and not |?
Hi Stephan
Why do we have double pipes for seperating the tiddler title from the
template in the transclusion rule?
Because originally I used the single pipe to separate a tooltip, copying
from the TWC image syntax which also marks a tooltip with a pipe. The idea
was to be able to apply a tooltip to an image:
{{MyImage|Another picture for you to look at}}
Then, later, I added the double pipe to separate templates. Later still, I
dropped the tooltip facility because I felt it wasn't relevant for most
transclusions.
I kept the double pipe because I thought it was much less brittle than
using a single pipe; it's tolerant of single pipes, for instance.
Now imagine what could be possible had we a way to pass more parameters
like:
Given that the tiddler you're transcluding is a macro definition and
associated macro call, this looks a lot like a use-case for global macros.
The rough plan there is to allow macros to be included with an `\include
tiddlertitle` pragma; then the rest of the tiddler would be able to
access any macros defined in that tiddler.
Then there'd be a mechanism to include all tiddlers that are tagged as
global macros within the page macros tiddler.
Best wishes
Jeremy
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Jeremy Ruston jeremy.rus...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Stephan
Why do we have double pipes for seperating the tiddler title from the
template in the transclusion rule?
Because I used the single pipe to separate
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Stephan Hradek
stephan.hra...@gmail.comwrote:
Mainly @Jeremy I guess.
Why do we have double pipes for seperating the tiddler title from the
template in the transclusion rule?
Would this be a nice place to put transclusion parameters?
For example: I have a template tiddler Wikipedia which looks like this:
___
\define Wikipedia(title)
a href=http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/$title$; target=_blank$view
field=title//a
\end
$macrocall $name=Wikipedia title={{!!title}}/
___
At the moment I can write: {{JavaScript||Wikipedia}}, but no chance to do
{{DOM-Navigation||Wikipedia}} as the proper title is
Document_Object_Model.
Now imagine what could be possible had we a way to pass more parameters
like:
{{DOM-Navigation|alternativ=Document_Object_Model|Wikipedia}}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWikiDev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com
--
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWikiDev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [twdev] [TW5] Transclusion: {{tiddler||template}} - Why || and not |?
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014 19:33:14 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: Given that the tiddler you're transcluding is a macro definition and associated macro call, this looks a lot like a use-case for global macros. The rough plan there is to allow macros to be included with an `\include tiddlertitle` pragma; then the rest of the tiddler would be able to access any macros defined in that tiddler. Still you would need to add something to any tiddler you want to use the macro in. Not so much difference to adding the full maco definition except for the fact that it's fewer text and easier to change. Then there'd be a mechanism to include all tiddlers that are tagged as global macros within the page macros tiddler. You mean similar to $:/tags/stylesheet we'll have $:/tags/globalmacro and all of them will readily be available in every tiddler? That would be good. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWikiDev group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [twdev] [TW5] Transclusion: {{tiddler||template}} - Why || and not |?
Hi Stephan Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014 19:33:14 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: Given that the tiddler you're transcluding is a macro definition and associated macro call, this looks a lot like a use-case for global macros. The rough plan there is to allow macros to be included with an `\include tiddlertitle` pragma; then the rest of the tiddler would be able to access any macros defined in that tiddler. Still you would need to add something to any tiddler you want to use the macro in. Yes, unless you tagged the tiddler $:/tags/macro. Not so much difference to adding the full maco definition except for the fact that it's fewer text and easier to change. Then there'd be a mechanism to include all tiddlers that are tagged as global macros within the page macros tiddler. You mean similar to $:/tags/stylesheet we'll have $:/tags/globalmacro and all of them will readily be available in every tiddler? That would be good. That's the idea, yes, Best wishes Jeremy. -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWikiDev group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
