Re: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release
Hi, this is just a perf improvement in some cases, nice to have, but nothing holding a release. The only point where I'm not sure is that those functions could potentially be called in situations where pointers are not properly aligned. This might not be the case here, but some investigation would have be done to check that. For now I'm deferring that Even Le 06/09/2025 à 15:05, Sulau via Tiff a écrit : Hi, I think MR 690 "TIFFSwabArrayOf[Short/Long/Long8/Float/Double]: more efficient implementation" should be looked at. At least some of the proposed improvements on C-level could be adopted in the same way for all Swab-functions if compiler specific built in extensions are in question. https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/690 Su -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tiff [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Even Rouault via Tiff Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2025 17:25 An: [email protected] Betreff: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release Hi, I see 4.7.0 was released about one year ago. I can issue a 4.7.1 release. Is there anything that should be included in it before? Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
Re: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release
Hi, I think MR 690 "TIFFSwabArrayOf[Short/Long/Long8/Float/Double]: more efficient implementation" should be looked at. At least some of the proposed improvements on C-level could be adopted in the same way for all Swab-functions if compiler specific built in extensions are in question. https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/690 Su -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tiff [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Even Rouault via Tiff Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2025 17:25 An: [email protected] Betreff: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release Hi, I see 4.7.0 was released about one year ago. I can issue a 4.7.1 release. Is there anything that should be included in it before? Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
Re: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release
Even, We opened a merge request recently that we would like to get in the next release. It implements CMYK to RGB conversion, and we have been patching libtiff with this for many years (so we have high confidence in it). https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/751/diffs I can get any feedback on the MR responded to today – so if there are any other potential problems we can get them resolved quickly. Thanks, Robert Boehne From: Tiff on behalf of Even Rouault via Tiff Date: Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 8:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release Hi, I see 4.7.0 was released about one year ago. I can issue a 4.7.1 release. Is there anything that should be included in it before? Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
Re: [Tiff] 4.7.1 release
I don't know of anything that needs to be included, but I'd like to see at least a short freeze period where I could take some time to test the current code in the repository before a release. Thanks, Lee. On 9/4/25 8:24 AM, Even Rouault via Tiff wrote: Hi, I see 4.7.0 was released about one year ago. I can issue a 4.7.1 release. Is there anything that should be included in it before? Even ___ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
