[Tigervnc-devel] [ tigervnc-Bug Tracker-3187957 ] Improve Tight [en/dec]oder to work also on non-RGB buffers

2011-02-21 Thread SourceForge.net
Bug Tracker item #3187957, was opened at 2011-02-21 10:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by atkac You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1126848aid=3187957group_id=254363 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] While we're updating i18n files ...

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:35:28PM -0600, DRC wrote: We should probably add something like Copyright (C)2010-2011 TigerVNC Team to po/tigervnc.pot. Right you are, I added copyright also to all .po files. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

[Tigervnc-devel] [ tigervnc-Bug Tracker-3183993 ] DeviceContext::getPF(HDC) returns defective PixelFormat

2011-02-21 Thread SourceForge.net
Bug Tracker item #3183993, was opened at 2011-02-16 19:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by atkac You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1126848aid=3183993group_id=254363 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4300] trunk/common/rfb/CConnection.cxx

2011-02-21 Thread DRC
This doesn't work right. If the server security type order is being honored, then it should be the case that if I set the server order to VncAuth,TLSVnc, the client should use VncAuth by default as long as VncAuth is in the client's list of security types. That is not what is happening. TLSVnc

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4300] trunk/common/rfb/CConnection.cxx

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:19:31AM -0600, DRC wrote: This doesn't work right. If the server security type order is being honored, then it should be the case that if I set the server order to VncAuth,TLSVnc, the client should use VncAuth by default as long as VncAuth is in the client's list of

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4300] trunk/common/rfb/CConnection.cxx

2011-02-21 Thread DRC
Confirmed. Let me spin a new build and double check it, and I think we're go for beta after that. On 2/21/11 7:43 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:19:31AM -0600, DRC wrote: This doesn't work right. If the server security type order is being honored, then it should be the case

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:46:27AM -0600, DRC wrote: I've spun a new build from r4305: http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're ready for beta. I propose that this build and source tarball become

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-02-21 Thread DRC
On 2/21/11 10:30 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: May I have some questions about Windows installer? 1. Why there is no winvnc with TLS? Because the only way I knew how to build TLS support was using MinGW, and WinVNC can't be built with MinGW. When I build TLS support on Windows, I am using the