Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-13 Thread DRC
No additional changes yet. I'm not sure if I fully understand the WM_TIMER issue enough to fix it. On 3/11/11 10:59 AM, Robert Goley wrote: > Have there been any additional changes regarding the refresh issue since > DRC's build yesterday? I saw some chatter about other patches but not > whethe

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-11 Thread Robert Goley
Have there been any additional changes regarding the refresh issue since DRC's build yesterday?  I saw some chatter about other patches but not whether they were used or were competing patches with his changes.  Overall, the windows viewer from your build yesterday is wo

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-10 Thread Robert Goley
I am still running the same viewer DRC provided this morning.  It has worked great for the most part.  I have noticed one or two times where it does not update or has a long delay in doing so.  An example would be typing "vi filename" and waiting for the content of the f

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-10 Thread DRC
I tested it with VirtualGL, and it produces the same frame rate as the Unix viewer on the same hardware. On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Martin Koegler wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:23:10AM -0600, DRC wrote: >> Now, as far as the Windows refresh issue, I did some digging. For >> starters, I

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-10 Thread Robert Goley
I have only done a little testing with it so far but I would say that DRC's changes has made it at the very least usable.  I will keep testing throughout the day but I think this may be all that was needed to make the windows viewer ready for 1.1 release...  Robert

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-10 Thread DRC
I completely agree. I won't be able to use the trunk for a while, because before I can go in and do any new development on it, I will need to integrate the new CMake build system with my pre-release build scripts as well as build-xorg (which will involve inevitable testing and debugging of all of

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-10 Thread Sebastiaan Breedveld
On 03/09/2011 11:31 PM, Robert Goley wrote: It should at least have one of the improvements you suggested implemented. I understand not wanting to invest much with a new viewer on the way but it sounds like it has a good bit to go right now. That is not slighting his accomplishments in gettin

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-09 Thread Robert Goley
It should at least have one of the improvements you suggested implemented.  I understand not wanting to invest much with a new viewer on the way but it sounds like it has a good bit to go right now.  That is not slighting his accomplishments in getting the viewing portio

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-09 Thread Martin Koegler
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:33:20PM -0600, DRC wrote: > Windows is still suffering from the TLS refresh issue described earlier. > It affects VirtualGL as well (you have to move the mouse to see the 3D > application change frames.) I don't have the time to look into this at > the moment, but IMHO,

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread DRC
Never mind. I figured out the procedure for generating .lib files. I've tested the patch, and it works great, so I checked it into 1.1 and documented the procedure necessary to build with Visual C++. Windows is still suffering from the TLS refresh issue described earlier. It affects VirtualGL as

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread Robert Goley
I looked at the enabled methods from the options window.  Only None was set for encryption.  I have had more than one installation of TigerVNC's WinVNC at this point so I can not be sure if it is a leftover setting or the actual default.  This should have all three check

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread DRC
The default behavior, assuming that both client and server were built with TLS support, is that VncAuth will be used by default, but TLSVnc can always be requested by the client, either from the command line or the GUI. If this isn't working, run Xvnc -? on the server and make sure that TLSVnc app

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread DRC
I don't see any problems with the patch, but how are you creating the Visual Studio .lib files? I'll need to document that process. On 3/8/11 7:58 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: > Hello, > > I just finished little patch for Windows installer. With this patch it > is possible to create .exe installer for

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread Robert Goley
One additional thing.  It seems that TLS connections are disabled by default.  Not sure if this is the real default or the result of using a build without TLS prior to this version.  My understanding was that TLS would be enabled so that VncAuth was default and TLS was a

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread Robert Goley
Thanks Adam for fixing the download permissions.  I was able to download it and install it.  First question is whether compiling it with debug mode is the reason for the service to leave a console window up.  You can't close that console without closing the service.  I h

[Tigervnc-devel] Improvements for Windows installer

2011-03-08 Thread Adam Tkac
Hello, I just finished little patch for Windows installer. With this patch it is possible to create .exe installer for TigerVNC stuff built with VC++ with GNUTLS support. Both winvnc and vncviewer can take advantage of TLS encryption. What is your opinion about the patch? Is it ok for 1.1? Insta