On 3/3/11 9:08 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Does 7.5 work now? Shall I be using that instead? (I wasn't because
> there were some strange build errors previously - maybe fixed now)
7.5 doesn't work on RHEL 4 or 5, but it may work on more recent systems
with newer autotools.
---
On 03/03/2011 08:37 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:17:32PM -0500, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote:
>>> I've spun a new build from r4305:
>>>
>>> http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
>>>
>>> It checks out on all known issues I had,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:17:32PM -0500, Antoine Martin wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote:
> > I've spun a new build from r4305:
> >
> > http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
> >
> > It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're
> > ready fo
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:30:13AM -0500, Antoine Martin wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 02:24 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> >On 02/22/11 09:39 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> >>/usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO /lib/libdl.so.2
> >>so try adding it to the linker command line
> >>/lib/libd
On 02/22/2011 02:24 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 02/22/11 09:39 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO /lib/libdl.so.2
so try adding it to the linker command line
/lib/libdl.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit
On 02/22/11 09:39 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO /lib/libdl.so.2
> so try adding it to the linker command line
> /lib/libdl.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[3]: *** [Xvnc] Error 1
> ma
On 02/22/2011 12:17 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote:
>> I've spun a new build from r4305:
>>
>> http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
>>
>> It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're
>> ready for beta. I propose that
On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote:
> I've spun a new build from r4305:
>
> http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
>
> It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're
> ready for beta. I propose that this build and source tarball become the
> official re
On 2/21/11 10:30 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> May I have some questions about Windows installer?
> 1. Why there is no winvnc with TLS?
Because the only way I knew how to build TLS support was using MinGW,
and WinVNC can't be built with MinGW. When I build TLS support on
Windows, I am using the pre-comp
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:46:27AM -0600, DRC wrote:
> I've spun a new build from r4305:
>
> http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
>
> It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're
> ready for beta. I propose that this build and source tarball beco
10 matches
Mail list logo
