[Tigervnc-devel] [ tigervnc-Bug Tracker-3386240 ] FLTK viewer on Windows sometimes crashes on exit

2011-08-11 Thread SourceForge.net
Bug Tracker item #3386240, was opened at 2011-08-04 17:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by astrand You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3386240&group_id=254363 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c

[Tigervnc-devel] [ tigervnc-Bug Tracker-3389999 ] r4473 produces errant behavior with TurboVNC Viewer

2011-08-11 Thread SourceForge.net
Bug Tracker item #338, was opened at 2011-08-11 06:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by dcommander You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=338&group_id=254363 Please note that this message will contain a full c

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4626] trunk/common

2011-08-11 Thread DRC
Per the report linked to below, things are now performing pretty much identically to TurboVNC at the low levels. At the high levels, I am still seeing too much CPU overhead, and I suspect that a lot of it is due to the ImageGetter class. I'm working on a way of accessing the framebuffer directly

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4626] trunk/common

2011-08-11 Thread DRC
Actually, upon further inspection, what is now limiting the performance is the ComparingUpdateTracker. When I turn it off, CPU usage drops to what I would expect from the optimizations that were just made, but then the network usage goes way up, as if it's sending duplicate frames. Thus, the aggre