On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:50:52PM -0500, DRC wrote:
> On 8/17/11 4:01 PM, Martin Koegler wrote:
> > First of all, Makefile.am is missing some include path, so that a out of
> > source tree build fails (xserver 1.7):
> > --- tigervnc-1.0.1.svn0.orig/unix/xserver/hw/vnc/Makefile.am
> > +++ tigervnc
I think that such a critical #define really needs to be #defined on the
command line. Manually #including it in every file that needs it is a
recipe for errors-- in this case, silent ones.
On 8/24/11 1:18 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
>
>> Can you please explain this further?
>
> If you don't inclu
On 8/24/11 2:04 AM, Martin Koegler wrote:
> I'm trying to build a debian package for tigervnc reusing the distribution
> xserver sources.
>
> To your commited build options patch:
>
> In my case, I put the xserver sources under the tigervnc sources
> (unix/xserver-XXX)
> and build the X server
Bug Tracker item #3397523, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397523&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bug Tracker item #3397523, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397523&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by snmishra
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full cop
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the co
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by snmishra
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the co
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by snmishra
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the co
Bug Tracker item #3397653, was opened at 2011-08-24 16:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by snmishra
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3397653&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:06:06AM -0500, DRC wrote:
> At any rate, I was able to reproduce the original issue after that, and
> I checked in your patch to fix it.
Just one more issue, the new build system install the man-pages to $prefix/man
instead of $prefix/share/man - as used in all major di
Manually including config.h in every file is the approach that's used for
the rest of the code. Look in /common etc. One alternative could be to use
a -include option to GCC, but I'm not sure this is much better.
Rgds,
Peter
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, DRC wrote:
I think that such a critical #de
On Aug 25, 2011, at 1:19 AM, Martin Koegler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:06:06AM -0500, DRC wrote:
>> At any rate, I was able to reproduce the original issue after that, and
>> I checked in your patch to fix it.
>
> Just one more issue, the new build system install the man-pages to
> $p
15 matches
Mail list logo
