Re: [Tigervnc-devel] forking the rfb spec

2009-04-02 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:06:46 +0200 Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:44:06PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: Reaching the other VNC people could be done via vnc-list, but that is to a large extent a RealVNC list, not a generic VNC list. I'm not sure it would be good

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] libjpeg/SIMD 64-bit build, etc.

2009-04-02 Thread DRC
Peter Åstrand wrote: Regardless of which libraries we decide to use, we need to select a decent assembler. In my opinion, NASM is a great assembler. Before we decided to use it for SIMD/jpeg, we evaluated different options and NASM certainly looked like the most promising solution, and I think

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] libjpeg/SIMD 64-bit build, etc.

2009-04-02 Thread Peter Åstrand
MSVC 2008 is certainly a problematic requirement for many people. As we have discussed before, one idea, which I still believe we should implement, is to get rid of all MS compiler dependencies. This means that the Autotools toolchain, GCC, and NASM could be used an all platforms. I agree with