[Tigervnc-devel] [ tigervnc-Feature Request Tracker-2674740 ] Create JPEG encoding

2011-09-01 Thread SourceForge . net
Feature Request Tracker item #2674740, was opened at 2009-03-09 11:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ossman_ You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1126849aid=2674740group_id=254363 Please note that this message will contain a full

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [PATCH] Multithreaded ComparingUpdateTracker

2011-09-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:54:26 -0600 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Have you done any research to validate the usefulness of the ComparingUpdateTracker? Personally, I found that, in Xvnc, it wasn't catching very many duplicate updates, and the dupes it was catching would not have

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Advanced TigerVNC features for 3D and streaming video workloads

2011-09-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:41:56 -0600 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I don't follow. ALR is only ever relevant for one frame at a time. It won't ever be sent unless the connection is completely idle for a specified period of time, so it can't be sent on multiple frames because

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [PATCH] Multithreaded ComparingUpdateTracker

2011-09-01 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Pierre Ossman wrote: Have you done any research to validate the usefulness of the ComparingUpdateTracker? Personally, I found that, in Xvnc, it wasn't catching very many duplicate updates, and the dupes it was catching would not have significantly slowed down performance

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Advanced TigerVNC features for 3D and streaming video workloads

2011-09-01 Thread DRC
On 9/1/11 3:34 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: I don't follow. ALR is only ever relevant for one frame at a time. It won't ever be sent unless the connection is completely idle for a specified period of time, so it can't be sent on multiple frames because there aren't multiple frames for it to