Feature Request Tracker item #2674740, was opened at 2009-03-09 11:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ossman_
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1126849aid=2674740group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:54:26 -0600
DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Have you done any research to validate the usefulness of the
ComparingUpdateTracker? Personally, I found that, in Xvnc, it wasn't catching
very many duplicate updates, and the dupes it was catching would not have
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:41:56 -0600
DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I don't follow. ALR is only ever relevant for one frame at a time. It
won't ever be sent unless the connection is completely idle for a
specified period of time, so it can't be sent on multiple frames because
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Have you done any research to validate the usefulness of the
ComparingUpdateTracker? Personally, I found that, in Xvnc, it wasn't
catching very many duplicate updates, and the dupes it was catching
would not have significantly slowed down performance
On 9/1/11 3:34 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
I don't follow. ALR is only ever relevant for one frame at a time. It
won't ever be sent unless the connection is completely idle for a
specified period of time, so it can't be sent on multiple frames because
there aren't multiple frames for it to