Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Fixing RFB latency sensitivity

2011-10-27 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:47:48 -0500 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: The second thread is gated by send blocking... The problem is that simple send blocking is insufficient. As my article mentions, by the time you get a block you've already filled up way too much of the buffers along

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4739] rfbproto/rfbproto.rst

2011-10-27 Thread DRC
I personally have no problem with this change, but I just wanted to note that the names are listed as TurboVNC blah blah blah in the official upstream RFB spec, so this change causes our spec to differ from the upstream one. Don't know if that's a problem or not. On 10/27/11 7:12 AM,