[Tigervnc-devel] Low-level ComparingUpdateTracker performance

2011-11-15 Thread DRC
The attached spreadsheet shows the low-level performance effects of enabling and disabling the CUT, as well as the effect of changing its block size to 256 x 256 instead of the default of 16 x 16. Tests were performed both with typical LAN settings (compress level=1/quality level=8) and WAN

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Low-level ComparingUpdateTracker performance

2011-11-15 Thread Peter Åstrand
The attached spreadsheet shows the low-level performance effects of enabling and disabling the CUT, as well as the effect of changing its block size to 256 x 256 instead of the default of 16 x 16. Tests were Nice work! If Cendio wants the CUT always enabled for their product, then that is