Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
I believe it's time to begin waving the axe. I've tweaked out the CMake build system so that it's purring like a kitten on all of the platforms we're supporting, and the build documentation has been modified accordingly. I'm going to go ahead and start removing the legacy stuff. On 6/21/11 2:49 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:06:54 -0500 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) trunk is meant to be experimental at the moment, so we need anyone who's using it to be experimental as well. Otherwise, we won't be hearing about issues that people uncover. The prerequisite to that is me finishing up the build-xorg modifications and the modifications to BUILDING.txt, so we have an official build procedure that uses CMake. Fair enough. Ping we when that is in place and we can start waving the axe around. :) Rgds -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c1 ___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
On 20/06/11 21:06, DRC wrote: Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) It may be an idea to start with providing a binary? (or did I miss it?) -- Tim -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:06:54 -0500 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) trunk is meant to be experimental at the moment, so we need anyone who's using it to be experimental as well. Otherwise, we won't be hearing about issues that people uncover. The prerequisite to that is me finishing up the build-xorg modifications and the modifications to BUILDING.txt, so we have an official build procedure that uses CMake. Fair enough. Ping we when that is in place and we can start waving the axe around. :) Rgds -- Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio ABWeb: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
Yes, that's the end game of the build-xorg mods. On 6/21/11 2:46 AM, Tim Ooms wrote: On 20/06/11 21:06, DRC wrote: Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) It may be an idea to start with providing a binary? (or did I miss it?) -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
FLTK 1.3.0 is also out now, so we have a stable target for that dependency (modulo the massive patch we have). Can you re-generate your patch against FLTK 1.3.0? I think we should remove the tarball from fltk/ and simply maintain a patch against the latest stable version. It will make the build documentation a lot easier. -- Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev ___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:06:40 -0500 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I am in the process of modifying build-xorg to build the new viewer. Then, I will do some performance analysis on it to figure out where we stand in that regard. AFAIC, we can remove the old viewer from trunk anytime you're ready, and I think once I'm done with the build-xorg mods that we should be able to remove autotools as well. Sounds good. But we should probably try to get some testing done before we start removing things. Perhaps switching over the new viewer as default to begin with? And can we do something to nudge people to use cmake without turning off autotools? Rgds -- Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio ABWeb: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer done
Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) trunk is meant to be experimental at the moment, so we need anyone who's using it to be experimental as well. Otherwise, we won't be hearing about issues that people uncover. The prerequisite to that is me finishing up the build-xorg modifications and the modifications to BUILDING.txt, so we have an official build procedure that uses CMake. On 6/20/11 6:09 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:06:40 -0500 DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I am in the process of modifying build-xorg to build the new viewer. Then, I will do some performance analysis on it to figure out where we stand in that regard. AFAIC, we can remove the old viewer from trunk anytime you're ready, and I think once I'm done with the build-xorg mods that we should be able to remove autotools as well. Sounds good. But we should probably try to get some testing done before we start removing things. Perhaps switching over the new viewer as default to begin with? And can we do something to nudge people to use cmake without turning off autotools? Rgds -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
