On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:19:18 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> > Isn't it required to state 65535 rectangles?
>
> Don't think so. I think a LastRect simply terminates the rect loop,
> and I don't think there is any way to send more than 65535 rects.
>
It has to be larger than the actual number o
Den 2009-06-16 13:33 skrev Pierre Ossman:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:30:09 +0200
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> +LastRect Pseudo-encoding
>> +
>> +
>> +A client which requests the *LastRect* pseudo-encoding is declaring
>> +that it does not need the exact number of rectangles in
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:30:09 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> +LastRect Pseudo-encoding
> +
> +
> +A client which requests the *LastRect* pseudo-encoding is declaring
> +that it does not need the exact number of rectangles in a
> +*FramebufferUpdate* message. Instead, it will st
commit bd5d706f122ea82c1367459bc7064fae7fc2202f
Author: Peter Rosin
Date: Thu Jun 11 13:04:59 2009 +0200
Describe the Tight LastRect Pseudo-encoding.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
diff --git a/rfbproto.rst b/rfbproto.rst
index 7034d9a..c6ee650 100644
--- a/rfbproto.rst
+++ b/rfbpr
