Assuming that Daniel's implementation is acceptable, I'm going to go ahead
and request the new framebuffer pseudo encoding per his suggestion. I'd
also like to request that the following three VeNCrypt subtypes be added to
the community spec:
+265 Ident Ident authentication
Daniel,
After I read Pierre's comments, I also thought a VeNCrypt subtype would be a
better way to implement authentication than trying to re-invent the wheel.
Anyone object to going with Daniel's implementation instead?
Thanks,
-brian
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 04:33:13PM -0400, Brian Hinz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was going to submit a request to RealVNC for an official allocation for a
> new security type, but I wanted to run past you guys first for some
> feedback. Basically it's an extension that allows a server side daemon to
> act
On Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:13 -0400
Brian Hinz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was going to submit a request to RealVNC for an official allocation for a
> new security type, but I wanted to run past you guys first for some
> feedback. Basically it's an extension that allows a server side daemon to
> act as a
Hi,
I was going to submit a request to RealVNC for an official allocation for a
new security type, but I wanted to run past you guys first for some
feedback. Basically it's an extension that allows a server side daemon to
act as a manager that just redirects clients to the port where user's
sessi
