So everything is derived from this oscillator, which is actually
10.2299543 MHz. This -4.57 mHz corrects for relativistic effects.
Neat. Thanks.
I got curious. How does that compare to the Doppler shifts?
google found this nice description of GPS :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David M. Witten II writes:
Can I still expect to see similar performance using more recent versions
of FreeBSD than you originally used?
Yes, the timestamping is done in hardware, so it does not depend on
the OS version.
Will a usable build of FreeBSD 7.x run in
btw... I once heard a story that early GPS SVs could turn off the
relativistic compensation. There was also a switch to reverse the
sign... ;-)
I don't remember hearing there was a sign reversal switch,
but all the other details on the first pre-GPS SV are here:
David
I would suggest that you email Bob Mokia ,(China) ,directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting his best price. I obtained my TBolt from
this source. It was a 2004 issue, and in excellent condition. It has been
performing superbly for the past three weeks, and in my case it had replaced
my
Hi Dave,
Thank you! Usually there is a section in the manual to do a quick
performance test. If it would be possible to scan this part, that would
help a lot!
Thank you, looking forward to your next message.
Best regards, Jeroen
Dave Brown wrote:
I have a mint 1600A plus manual (s?) here
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 00:21 -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
So everything is derived from this oscillator, which is actually
10.2299543 MHz. This -4.57 mHz corrects for relativistic
effects.
Neat. Thanks.
I got curious. How does that compare to the Doppler shifts?
google found this
Greetings,
There are a lot of regulations that mandate synchronized time.
But do any of these regulations or laws require time to be accurate within
'x' seconds? Such as, 'time much be synchronized within 5 seconds of GPS
time.
Thanx,
Gretchen
___
- Original Message -
From: Gretchen Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 5:03 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Do any regulations or laws require time to be accurate
within 'x' seconds?
Greetings,
Hello Roy
Thanks,I am Bob also the fluke.l on ebay.Most of the gentlemans at here seem
have known me.
As the Time-nuts member .if any member buy any stuff on my ebay store.
if you Directly use the Paypal not from ebay,i will offer 5 % discount .
and if my goods have any problem and No
BTW, it would appear as though my HP 53131A counter reads 220 mHz low
with a 2 second gate time. There appears to be no appreciable drift;
it always reads 220 mHz low. I'm sure there is a name for that
measurement, I hope to learn it soon.
Congratulations. You just measured the frequency
Have folks received their T-Bolts from the last batch via TAPR ?
A friend ordered one the first day, got his confirmation and is still
waiting.
Thanks, Dick, W1KSZ
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Got mine a couple of days ago.
Thanks TAPR! I finally have a standard besides WWV.
Mike - AA8K
Richard W. Solomon wrote:
Have folks received their T-Bolts from the last batch via TAPR ?
A friend ordered one the first day, got his confirmation and is still
waiting.
Thanks, Dick,
Hi Dick,
So far not yet received but the unit usually goes thru the custom
office long process...
Rgds Ernie.
-Original Message-
From: Richard W. Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 3:55 am
Subject: [time-nuts] Trimble T-Bolt Order
Have folks
13 matches
Mail list logo
