In a message dated 16/07/2010 16:14:28 GMT Daylight Time,
swith...@idcomm.com writes:
I am in search of a PTS-310 manual. I know that Nigel GM8PZR has a PDF
copy, but have been unable to find an email address. So, Nigel if you are
listening would you mind sending me a copy. I believe
Hello nuts,
I am in search of a PTS-310 manual. I know that Nigel GM8PZR has a PDF
copy, but have been unable to find an email address. So, Nigel if you are
listening would you mind sending me a copy. I believe my email will suck up
large attachments.
Also if anyone else has a copy or k
Hi
Here in Carlisle PA the same check shows the iPhone 3G "within a second".
That's running 3G, with no odd settings on the phone.
Bob
On Jul 16, 2010, at 3:06 AM, Rex wrote:
> I'm in San Jose. (Same Bay you are talking about?) I am on AT&T but I have a
> Motoroloa Razr that's at least a co
On 7/16/2010 12:00 AM, Peter Monta wrote:
> Here in the Bay Area, AT&T/iPhone time has gotten noticeably worse
> recently. The error used to be around 4 seconds; now it's 49 seconds (!).
>
> Emerald Time is fine for interactive use, but what I find very impolite
> is that AT&T's bad timestamps a
On 7/16/2010 1:57 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
> li...@ozindfw.net said:
>
>> Most newer operational standards can't tolerate this and "accurate" time
>> (better than a ms) is important. WiMAX requires TDD base stations to base
>> station alignment to be better than 1 microsecond. Most telecom oper
In Tampa bay AT&T is about 17 seconds off
--
Mike
On Jul 16, 2010, at 1:00, Peter Monta wrote:
> Oz-in-DFW writes:
>
>>> ... There is no way AT&T would be 12.4 seconds off ...
>>>
>>
>> I used to work in the cell infra business. While it's less true today,
>> there are still a number of ope
Rex wrote:
> I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly within
> about a second.
Well, apparently it is a phone issue and not a cell-tower issue.
Searching the support forums yields the following trick: disable
the automatic time setting, set it manually to a grossly wrong
time, t
pmo...@gmail.com said:
> It would be amusing to arrange for a long-term record of the offset of one's
> phone (which can of course change across multiple providers during travel),
> say by using a background process to take a sample every few hours against
> NTP sources or against GPS if the phone
I'm in San Jose. (Same Bay you are talking about?) I am on AT&T but I
have a Motoroloa Razr that's at least a couple years old.
I just checked the phone's displayed time vs the internet and also my
GPS receiver. I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly
within about a second. Go
