Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Ray Xu
Hi Tom, I am just curious... What did you mean if the GPS was warmed up? Do you mean the Jupiter GPS unit its self to be warmed up? (if so, what does the Jupiter unit have to do with the oscillator stability, besides providing that 10KHz signal?) Great info, thanks. Do you have any

[time-nuts] FS 4x 5MHz OCXO

2012-01-29 Thread Timeok
For sale lot of 4 OCXO 2x Oscilloquartz 8676-AT 5 MHz 12V. (Used) 2x Isotemp OCXO91-30 5 MHz (brand new) for 50.00 Euro + shipping rate extimated shipping cost for europe 45 Euro, Italy 14 Euro. If interested email me directly to: tim...@timeok.it Luciano P. S. Paramithiotti IZ5JHJ

Re: [time-nuts] eBay FE-5680A

2012-01-29 Thread Rob Kimberley
Hi Brad, I've had no problems so far. I bought a couple on a free postage deal (took about a month). Both worked fine, and just in process of building them into a case. Communications with the guy in China were first class. You also need to realise, that you are getting one hell of a deal with

[time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
Hello, As it has been discussed in the past days, the architecture of the newer FE-5680A that has been recently purchased by a lot of us does not led to a trimming resolution through the serial port of 1.7854e-7Hz, but rather leds to think that the trimming resolution is in fact 6.80789e-6Hz

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Azelio Boriani
Wow, good work, a very fine reverse engineering attempt. On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Javier Herrero jherr...@hvsistemas.eswrote: Hello, As it has been discussed in the past days, the architecture of the newer FE-5680A that has been recently purchased by a lot of us does not led to a

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi Javier, On 01/29/2012 12:45 PM, Javier Herrero wrote: Hello, As it has been discussed in the past days, the architecture of the newer FE-5680A that has been recently purchased by a lot of us does not led to a trimming resolution through the serial port of 1.7854e-7Hz, but rather leds to

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
El 29/01/2012 13:57, Magnus Danielson escribió: Hi Javier, On 01/29/2012 12:45 PM, Javier Herrero wrote: Hello, As it has been discussed in the past days, the architecture of the newer FE-5680A that has been recently purchased by a lot of us does not led to a trimming resolution through the

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Very interesting. It sounds like dithering would be needed to get down to parts in 10^-14. If we do that from an external device (PC / PIC / FPGA / whatever) it would be useful to know the delay between the serial command and the DDS update. The more variable the delay, the less accurate

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi That is indeed an odd update rate. The short term stability of the FE-5680 is in the parts in 10^-13 range once you get past 100 seconds. I would think updates of a DDS lsb or more would mess up the stability. Of course if it is temperature correction, it may still be in the noise. Bob

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 01/29/2012 02:45 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Very interesting. It sounds like dithering would be needed to get down to parts in 10^-14. If we do that from an external device (PC / PIC / FPGA / whatever) it would be useful to know the delay between the serial command and the DDS update. The

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Yes, I think the dither would just be a minor routine running on what ever you use to discipline the rubidium. Other than a disciplined environment I don't see a lot of need for sub 7x10^-13 steps. Bob On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: On

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you lock up a simple VCXO with a basic PLL, your 10 GHz LO will flop around a couple hundred hertz on a second to second basis. To get good performance off of GPS you need long averaging times. Your oscillator needs to be pretty stable without the GPS. That is where some sort of TCXO or

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
El 29/01/2012 14:45, Bob Camp escribió: Hi Very interesting. It sounds like dithering would be needed to get down to parts in 10^-14. If we do that from an external device (PC / PIC / FPGA / whatever) it would be useful to know the delay between the serial command and the DDS update. The

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Scott Newell
At 05:45 AM 1/29/2012, Javier Herrero wrote: For example, the following data has been gathered: Serial offset 00 00 00 00 DDS A word: 44 02 62 F6 = 1141007094 = 5 313 228.32219 Hz DDS B word: 43 FD CC 8E = 1140706446 = 5 311 828.32085 Hz Can you do a test at +/- fullscale offset as well?

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
I'm now gathering the unit self-updating of DDS data, that will take somewhat long... so I will try later or tomorrow. Since we have seen that the DDS values are reported back in a response to a command, it is easy to do without the need to have anything hooked to the SPI bus :) Regards,

[time-nuts] CSD-510

2012-01-29 Thread Don Henderickx
I wonder if anyone in the group might have any technical info on a Leitch CSD-510 clock system driver I believe it was made for the broadcast ind. I have tried web searches but only find sellers of the unit. Don wa9ylp ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you try to do full scale, check the range of your VCXO first. The digital test is much easier if you already know where your VCXO stops tuning. Bob On Jan 29, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Javier Herrero jherr...@hvsistemas.es wrote: I'm now gathering the unit self-updating of DDS data, that

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A roughly 30 second update rate makes a lot of sense. That would keep the update steps buried in the short term stability noise. Good news on the serial update timing and it's stability. Sounds like you could do several updates a second. That's plenty fast enough. Bob On Jan 29, 2012,

[time-nuts] Trimble firmware updates and GPS signal structure.

2012-01-29 Thread GandalfG8
Whilst downloading some information from Trimble's support pages today I discovered, only two years late:-), that in January 2010 Trimble released firmware upgrades for the Acutime Gold, Mini-T, Resolution T, Thunderbolt E, and no doubt other GPS units too. Trimble states in each case.

[time-nuts] FE-5680A command decoding speculation

2012-01-29 Thread John Beale
Speculation... just for fun. Seeing Javier's great recent work on the 5680 DDS operation has me thinking more about two of the mystery commands. If the unit is applying a periodic correction to the DDS frequency beyond what the user requests via RS-232 commands, as a function of (for

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A command decoding speculation

2012-01-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Unlike a GPSDO, a rubidium does not have a reference to construct a table against. If they are doing temperature correction, it would run on a factory loaded table. Bob On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:35 PM, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com wrote: Speculation... just for fun. Seeing Javier's

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Ray Xu rayxu...@gmail.com wrote: Also, what is the advantage of using a OCXO instead of a VCXO in terms of short-term accuracy?  If the PLL time constant is only a few seconds, then a crystal shouldn't deviate in frequency by too much within a few seconds,

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble firmware updates and GPS signal structure.

2012-01-29 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 29/01/2012 21:54:02 GMT Standard Time, gandal...@aol.com writes: No firmware update seems to be available for the original Thunderbolt, nor for other earlier units, which probably isn't too surprising but I don't recall anyway ever noticing periodic dropouts of this

[time-nuts] Lucent RFTGm-II-XO and RFTGm-II-Rb pin outs and interconnect

2012-01-29 Thread J. L. Trantham
I seem to recall seeing this (or perhaps for the 'non-II' units) in the past but can't seem to find it. Can anyone point me to the pin outs and interconnects for these units? Thanks in advance. Joe ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Javier Herrero jherr...@hvsistemas.es wrote: El 29/01/2012 14:45, Bob Camp escribió: My next intention is to replace the OCXO in one of my Thunderbolts with a Rb and use a small microcontroller to get the voltage correction from the Thunderbolt through the

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Ray Xu
Hi Chris Thanks for your helpful input. What do you mean by average? Do you mean that the GPS and PLL must be kept on for 20 minutes to hours, or did you mean that the PLL loop filter must have a time constant of 20 minutes to several hours? To me, the latter seems really unpractical for

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Ray Xu
Hi Erno Thanks for your suggestion; while it is convenient to have everything already planned out, I'm inclined on DIY'ing as much as I can :-) Ray Xu On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Erno Peres erniepe...@aol.com wrote: Hi Ray, please find on this link the info what you are looking for.

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Don't confuse the PLL loop time constant with the time constant of the analog or digital filter. They are not the same. Bruce Ray Xu wrote: Hi Chris Thanks for your helpful input. What do you mean by average? Do you mean that the GPS and PLL must be kept on for 20 minutes to hours, or did

[time-nuts] FE-5680A decoded - another piece of the puzzle

2012-01-29 Thread Skip Withrow
Hello Nuts, I've been trying to get the analog EFC to work on the FE-5650A (a very close cousin of the FE-5680A). On these oscillators it is normally on pin-8 of the DB-9 (Option 12 and 30). As one of the serial lines is on this pin, I traced the jumper that is placed for the EFC option(s).

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread Hal Murray
What do you mean by average? Do you mean that the GPS and PLL must be kept on for 20 minutes to hours, or did you mean that the PLL loop filter must have a time constant of 20 minutes to several hours? You have to compare the characteristics of the oscillator with the characteristics of

Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO trouble using Jupiter-T

2012-01-29 Thread David
The sawtooth error in the PPS output and how they were able to correct it externally was interesting. I have seen that kind of problem before in DDS and other applications. I wonder what other GPS receivers provide either PPS outputs without sawtooth noise or a correction message. On Sun, 29

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent OMR Hookup Info (FE-5650A)

2012-01-29 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Skip: I just got the Lucent OMR module with a FE-5650A. Do you know if there's hook-up info for the OMR? http://www.prc68.com/I/FEIFS.shtml#FE5650A Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/Brooke4Congress.html Skip Withrow wrote: Hello Nuts, I've

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
Hello, Also I expect that the range would be somewhat limited by the unit software, since the control word is 32-bit, same as the DDS program word with, and I don't think that the little thing would enable to program the DDS from zero to 32-bit. In any case, my idea was first to only monitor

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Herrero
El 30/01/2012 03:19, Chris Albertson escribió: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Javier Herrerojherr...@hvsistemas.es wrote: El 29/01/2012 14:45, Bob Camp escribió: My next intention is to replace the OCXO in one of my Thunderbolts with a Rb and use a small microcontroller to get the