Re: [time-nuts] NTGS50AA, better than Thunderbolt?

OK, what are the differences between 37265 34310 49422 The 32765 is in one of my thunderbolts. I replaced the failed OCXO in another Thunderbolt with the 49422. The 49422 has a different pinout, is taller, and has opposite gain. Is there a difference in stability? Any pin for pin replacement

[time-nuts] Lady Heather command line?

Hi, can someone please tell me how to get the satellite graphic plot up on lady heather by using command line switches at program start? If I enter s then 3 when the program is running I get some displays up, but when I try to add the commands to the startup it gives me the help text. I have tried

Re: [time-nuts] NTGS50AA, better than Thunderbolt?

Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: OK, what are the differences between 37265 34310 49422 The 32765 is in one of my thunderbolts. I replaced the failed OCXO in another Thunderbolt with the 49422. The 49422 has a different pinout, is taller, and has opposite gain. Is there a difference in

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather command line?

Le 02/06/2012 09:22, ken johnson a écrit : Hi, can someone please tell me how to get the satellite graphic plot up on lady heather by using command line switches at program start? If I enter s then 3 when the program is running I get some displays up, but when I try to add the commands to the

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather command line?

Thanks Mike, that worked a treat- and next time, I will read the help file in a bit more detail- I completely missed that one! On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:07 PM, mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote: Le 02/06/2012 09:22, ken johnson a écrit : Hi, can someone please tell me how to get the satellite

[time-nuts] GPS and Rubidium frequency standards and noise question (newbie).

I am looking to get a frequency standard for my amateur radio shack, initially for verifying test gear readings, but later as a standard to lock receiver and transmitter oscillators to. I was going to buy a GPS frequency standard but a friend warned me these may have noise issues when

Re: [time-nuts] GPS and Rubidium frequency standards and noise question (newbie).

If you want a frequency reference. There is nothing better than GPS. In fact it you bought a Rubidium you would still need the GPS so you could calibrate its frequency. Some GPSes might be noisy but then you can lock a good double oven crystal oscillator to it and have what they call a GPS

Re: [time-nuts] GPS and Rubidium frequency standards and noise question (newbie).

On 6/2/12 2:57 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: I am looking to get a frequency standard for my amateur radio shack, initially for verifying test gear readings, but later as a standard to lock receiver and transmitter oscillators to. I was going to buy a GPS frequency standard but a friend

Re: [time-nuts] GPS and Rubidium frequency standards and noise question (newbie).

Chris, To answer your question regarding using a Rubidium standard as a frequency reference for your Transverters. GPS really has nothing to do the main requirement regarding Phase Noise and your Transceivers. But the 10MHz oscillator inside the Rubidium standard is the item that will be the

[time-nuts] Austron 1250A

I just put a new (unused - not exactly new), Austron 1250A Crystal Frequency Standard on eBay should anyone be interested. -Doug Ronald ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to