[time-nuts] Thunderbolt tuning DAC theory of operation

2013-11-02 Thread Stewart Cobb
While poking around the Thunderbolt to determine whether -5V could be used in place of -12V, I discovered how the OCXO tuning DAC works. Apologies if this is old news, but I haven't seen it documented before. The 10MHz sine wave from the OCXO is squared up and used to clock the Xilinx 5200 CPLD

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi Bob, On 11/02/2013 06:07 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The real answer is that nobody knows. The economics essentially make finding out very expensive. Q most certainly goes up, I don’t think anybody disputes that. The questions about flicker / ADEV all revolve around small blank parts with

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi As I mentioned there is data. It’s from parts made in small packages. Even back in the days of glass packages they didn’t / couldn’t go for full size blanks at low frequencies. There *is* a lot of data that things like flicker noise are not improved when you have a blank edge very much

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi All the numbers I gave assume you are starting from a 3rd / 5th at 10 MHz. Bob On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:30 AM, David McGaw n1...@alum.dartmouth.org wrote: This all seems to be forgetting that the crystals are usually operated at 3rd or 5th harmonic. The crystal in a 10811A is 10 MHz/3rd

Re: [time-nuts] 32.768Khz Crystal/Resonator suggestions.

2013-11-02 Thread Didier Juges
It all depends on how accurate the frequency has to be. If you only need 2%, I would use a C8051F300 microcontroller's built-in oscillator (24.5MHz +/-2%) and divide it down using the processor itself. The chip comes in a 11 pin QFN that is 3x3 mm, a little bigger than you need, but it does not

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Mike Feher
Exactly - I mentioned this on here about 3 years ago and all of the self-proclaimed geniuses poo-pooded it. I was told early in my engineering career in the early 70's, by a very smart man, when I thought I had all of the answers, that considering all of the trade-offs regarding performance,

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Well what I’ve been going from is the information I was taught by the people who actually designed all those crystals back in the 40’s 50’s and 60’s. Bob On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Mike Feher mfe...@eozinc.com wrote: Exactly - I mentioned this on here about 3 years ago and all of the

Re: [time-nuts] 32.768Khz Crystal/Resonator suggestions.

2013-11-02 Thread Didier Juges
I have actually used these chips at 125C and the factory even gave me extensive data supporting even higher temperature operation (for missile applications,m can't tell you more). Don't know about 150C though. That is pretty high. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Didier Juges shali...@gmail.com

Re: [time-nuts] 32.768Khz Crystal/Resonator suggestions.

2013-11-02 Thread Didier Juges
The C8051F300 also has a built-in temperature sensor and ADC, so you could probably implement temperature compensation without any additional component if needed. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Didier Juges shali...@gmail.com wrote: I have actually used these chips at 125C and the factory

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Mike Feher
Yes - me too - several even published books and papers on the subject. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc. 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 office 908-902-3831 cell -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Tom Knox
Mike I think we must be talking to the same smart people. I think 5MHz was adopted over 3MHz simply because 5MHz multiplies to other commonly used frequencies with greater ease. I think the top frequency standards have evolved to 5MHz Third Overtone SC cut crystals for a reason. The evolution

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The only thing that the 5 MHz 3rd crystal is “optimum” for is a holder that will accept a 0.55” max diameter blank. Bpb On Nov 2, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote: Mike I think we must be talking to the same smart people. I think 5MHz was adopted over 3MHz simply

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Tom Knox
From reading your past posts I must respect your opinion. Your are obviously extremely educated on the subject. So why is there some disagreement in two very knowledgeable groups? Thomas Knox From: li...@rtty.us Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 18:44:18 -0400 To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re:

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I believe that you are talking to two very different groups, one who actually design the crystals and the other who use the products that are designed. One is talking about what they can buy, the other is talking about what could / could not be done and why. Bob On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:22

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 11/03/2013 02:45 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi I believe that you are talking to two very different groups, one who actually design the crystals and the other who use the products that are designed. One is talking about what they can buy, the other is talking about what could / could not be

Re: [time-nuts] The 5MHz Sweet Spot

2013-11-02 Thread Jim Lux
On 11/2/13 7:40 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: On 11/03/2013 02:45 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi I believe that you are talking to two very different groups, one who actually design the crystals and the other who use the products that are designed. One is talking about what they can buy, the other is