>>> For more money, yixunhk has some nicely packaged units and AFAIK he has a
>>> good reputation.
BTW I have a '58503A' from him. It did and does (a year later) still work,
although it took me a while to get it going. But it was a bit iffy - obviously
in a re-made case and the eBay images
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist
wrote:
> I left Agilent just before the split, but I don't know
> anyone there who liked that name. Or the logo :-)
Another recent name change (acquisition) that is even worse is
Aeroflex to Cobham. I realize that
The consensus seems to be that I was expecting more than I should
have. That's what I get for reading service manuals :-)
Other than the confusion over what I was expecting, I can't fault the
cal lab I sent the meter to. They are charging me a hobbyist-friendly
price and aren't going to charge me
I'm helping a colleague resurrect a hard-luck HP 3048A phase noise
measurement system. In particular, he asked me to help get the 3561A
dynamic signal analyzer working again. I downloaded Volume 1 of the
service manual from Keysight, which contains Sections I through VI
but does not contain
Joe
I will believe they only do that procedure in a real repair.
I had to do the same thing on a tek 2465b scope. O man what a complete pain
in the rear and literally 8+ hours of work. So I can fully appreciate the
reality that a Calibration is a check and trim for accuracy. Most likely an
hour or
'Normal' calibration is a performance check and adjustments as required
Performance checks are applying stimulus and checking instrument response is
within the acceptable range.
A Full calibration is adjust each parameter to as close as practicable to ideal
value and may include new cal
On 2/12/2016 12:14 PM, Joseph Gray wrote:
I sent my HP 3457A in for cal. I should be getting it back next week.
I won't mention where I sent it, but it wasn't Keysight (I don't like
that name). I recently changed the SRAM battery and purposely did not
I left Agilent just before the split, but
I sent my HP 3457A in for cal. I should be getting it back next week.
I won't mention where I sent it, but it wasn't Keysight (I don't like
that name). I recently changed the SRAM battery and purposely did not
save the cal constants. I bought the meter second hand and it wasn't
in spec when I
Warren,
What is the purpose of "Unseal the internal tuning nut by loosing it ~
1/2 turn"?
And which internal tuning nut are you referring to?
Cheers,
Corby
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Any 3561A will work.
Rob
NC0B
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Charles
Steinmetz
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 12:28 PM
To: TimeNuts
Subject: [time-nuts] Seeking HP 3561A schematic diagrams
I'm helping a colleague resurrect a
On 2/12/2016 11:28 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote:
I'm helping a colleague resurrect a hard-luck HP 3048A phase noise
measurement system. In particular, he asked me to help get the 3561A
dynamic signal analyzer working again. I downloaded Volume 1 of the
service manual from Keysight, which
Generally, whenever I've had a non manufacturer 'calibration' it's been a
certification service that tells you your equipment is within spec and
gives you the variances and probability of uncertainty, a pass/fail test.
Where equipment was out of spec then any service to bring it within spec
was
On 12 Feb 2016 21:12, "Joseph Gray" wrote:
>
> I sent my HP 3457A in for cal. I should be getting it back next week.
> I won't mention where I sent it, but it wasn't Keysight (I don't like
> that name). I recently changed the SRAM battery and purposely did not
> save the cal
Volume 2 actually contains Section VII (250 pages) with schematics. I bought a
reasonably good scan, including oversized fold outs, at Qservice in Greece for
25 dollars (ebay item 380066695055 ). For fairness to the seller,I donì't offer
to send you a copy. If I remember, it is possible to save
14 matches
Mail list logo