Ole I can only point you toward cesium references I remember reading about
the magnet configuration and it did matter. Sorry it was a while ago.
Others may know the reference. It was the HP 5060 as I barely recall.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Ole Petter Ronningen
Ole,
Spin exchange tuning for a classic (non-autotuned) Maser is performed to
put the cavity to the frequency that corresponds to the point that
eliminates the frequency shift caused by changes in the Hydrogen flux.
This enhances the short term stability at short time scales. This tunes
the
There is indeed a quad- or hexa-pole state selection magnet between the
dissociator and the cavity, required to select the atoms of the correct
state to allow a population inversion resulting in oscillation.
My understanding is that the spin-exchange of interest takes place between
atoms already
_http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/26593-m%C3%B6bius-metamaterial-ins
pired-signal-sources-and-sensors_
(http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/26593-möbius-metamaterial-inspired-signal-sources-and-sensors)
Ulrich
___
time-nuts
Ole,
Quite looking forward to the replies. Though no intention to own a maser
currently.
I thought there was a method of rejecting or reducing types of spin.
Therefore reducing the impact you mention. Essentially a state selector.
Pretty sure that thought will get corrected pretty quickly.
Regards
This looks a lot like my initial GPSDO try. I didn’t create an account on that
site, so I couldn’t look at the full schematics, but from the text description,
it looks like they’re using 100 second sampling of whole cycle counts. This
worked ok, but the addition of the phase discriminator
Hi. Apologies for a long post.
I'm trying to read up on the "care and feeding of hydrogen masers". While
they are conceptually simple from a distance, there's quite a bit going on
in the quantum mechanics department when looked at up close. Somewhat
frustratingly, I am not mentally equipped to
Hi
What he has done is best termed an FLL approach. A PLL is indeed a possible
solution. Even
with a FLL, he has quickly run into the fundamental problem of being able to
measure the
result. Without that, he is dead in the water. Optimization is the key next
step. To do that you
need data as
Just throwing this into the lion's den.
https://www.elektormagazine.com/labs/gps-assisted-10-mhz-frequency-reference
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and
Elector Labs (Netherlands publisher), June 14,2016
GPS assisted 10 MHz frequency reference
https://www.elektormagazine.com/news/build-a-high-precision-10-mhz-frequency-reference?
--
Sent from iPad Air
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To
Hi Michael,
Thanks, that plot and the info gives a useful comparison.
I think in light of everything, doing some tests with a generally
upgraded setup would be the way to go for now.
There would actually be several rubidiums, although initially with a
bit of cheating - 1 counter, a 10PPS
BTW, the Jupiter receivers have a command that can configure the 1PPS output
to 100PPS.
I got in some V.KSEL Sirf and Ublox receiver modules today and taught Lady
Heather to speak SIRF binary. Kind of a waste... SIRF does not give give you
any control over the 1PPS signal and the message
Thanks, sounds like the TU60-D120 series has a completely different firmware
numbering system than the TU30-140/410 in the link below. I ordered one and
hopefully it will be fine. Suspect they are newer versions than the TU30's
http://www.jrmiller.demon.co.uk/projects/ministd/frqstd0.htm
13 matches
Mail list logo