That's encouraging!! I'm working on NTP and have no idea what's happening. The
description says it takes over the PC clock, excluding other apps. I like the
rate correction concept, but not if I lose my hair or have to wipe the drive.
Ron
From: Charles Steinmetz
rick.jon...@hpe.com said:
> HalM was kind enough to come over the other day with some antennae which we
> tried without success.
I was going to suggest taking the cover off and looking inside but it fell
off my to-do list.
GPS receivers are reasonably specialized. I doubt it anybody makes
A new interesting toy soon to be crowdsourced:
https://www.crowdsupply.com/amungo-navigation/nut4nt
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
Hey Bob!
>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>> Dear fellow time-nuts!
>> I'm currently investigating my options regarding
>> GPS antennae (of course for time related purposes)
>> and I'm
Hi
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>
> Hey Bob!
>
>>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>>> Dear fellow time-nuts!
>
>>> I'm currently
Do you have a picture of the balcony?
- Original Message -
From: "Herbert Poetzl"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 5:29 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] GPS antenna selection
Dear fellow time-nuts!
I'm currently investigating my options
I have been bequeathed a TrueTime XL-DC, Model 151-601-1, serial number
1671 per a sticker on the side. On the back, on the right as one faces
the back, is a small sticker that says "Down Conv. Req'd"
Unsurprisingly, it has arrived without an antenna. If the original
antenna still exists,
Hi
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> Dear fellow time-nuts!
>
> I'm currently investigating my options regarding
> GPS antennae (of course for time related purposes)
> and I'm really confused by the variety they come
> in ... (my apologies in
Hi Herbert,
just look the loss of the cable at 1500 MHz, and you will start to cry
at 1500MHz tha cable will have cca 30dB for a 30meter long
piecebasically that RG174 looks very nice with that small antenna
but that is the only positive aspect. Meinberg in Germany has one
up/down
David wrote:
I am not sure if Tardis works with Windows 7 and above though; I
forget to test it on my Windows 7 test system when I had it. It is a
pretty old (but free) program.
About five years ago, after a lot of experience with Tardis under XP, I
worked for several weeks trying to get it
Dear fellow time-nuts!
I'm currently investigating my options regarding
GPS antennae (of course for time related purposes)
and I'm really confused by the variety they come
in ... (my apologies in advance for the long post).
Setting:
I'm living in a three storey house with a sloped
roof, a
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:05:13 + (UTC), you wrote:
>My granddaughter would love to know I have a Tardis program. (-;> Lots of
>things to try here, just to get a more accurate clock. No wonder there's a
>time-nutz group!
The Tardis log shows that accessing external NTP servers is a problem
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:24:31 +, Mark Sims wrote:
> Probably the best way for most people to keep their clock accurate is to
> use something like NTP
Doesn't Meinberg have a Win7 version of ntp on their homepage ?
Why not use that
CFO
___
My granddaughter would love to know I have a Tardis program. (-;> Lots of
things to try here, just to get a more accurate clock. No wonder there's a
time-nutz group!
From: David
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Sent:
The old Tardis program for Windows (Tardis2000 now) handles it
correctly by altering the rate and only jamming the time if it is
outside of a specified window but I do not think its GPS mode supports
the 1 PPS signal.
I am not sure if Tardis works with Windows 7 and above though; I
forget to test
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:08:52 -0400
Ruslan Nabioullin wrote:
> Hi, I'm in the process of setting up a public stratum 1 NTP server which
> will have at least one standard as a fallback to GPS (and possibly WWV
> and CHU), in addition to its primary purpose as a timebase for
Probably the best way for most people to keep their clock accurate is to use
something like NTP with a local GPS receiver that provides a 1PPS signal that
you can get into your computer (not always an easy thing to do and get working
properly). Done properly, this can get you into the
Hi, I'm in the process of setting up a public stratum 1 NTP server which
will have at least one standard as a fallback to GPS (and possibly WWV
and CHU), in addition to its primary purpose as a timebase for a
microwave active SETI transmitter. So far I have an aging = 1E-11
rubidium standard
Thanks. Although I'm brand new here, I've seen some posts talking about Lady
Heather (some with amusing suggestions) and will look into it. Might just be
what I need. I'm working with NTP right now, using Dimension 4, after having
discovered D4's history info.
Thanks again, Ron
From:
The WRONG way to adjust a PC clock is to set the TIME periodically from
some standard. When you do this then the time on the PC is not running at
a constant rate. The correct way to do this is to adjust the PC's clocks
RATE. You make it runs slightly faster if you notice it is getting behind
20 matches
Mail list logo