On 14/02/2017 12:24 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
Pretty dramatic difference between a "real" serial port and USB. Like two
orders of magnitude or more.
If you computer lacks a serial port, just buy a new computer. The
Raspberry Pi or the like costs about $40 the serial port has a pin that
Pretty dramatic difference between a "real" serial port and USB. Like two
orders of magnitude or more.
If you computer lacks a serial port, just buy a new computer. The
Raspberry Pi or the like costs about $40. But the money you save on
electric power will pay off that $40 in less than a
just be careful, because if you under-heat the cathode you could kill it
73
Alex
On 2/13/2017 7:11 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
I think what you would
Hi
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the
>> data book
>> that came with the instrument plotted
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>
>
> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the
> data book
> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
> crystal in
> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly
Agreed, it's probably reasonable to say that a real absorption wavemeter would
(a) have to have a meter or some other visual indicator; and (b) likely be
powered exclusively by the energy its tank circuit "absorbs." The BC221/LM
boxes fall a little short of both requirements.
-- john,
Hi
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> First of all, Wow what an interesting read, thanks for sharing some of the
> history and your experiences with the 105. A second thanks for uploading
> the manual, which I found to be a great
Hi
With a VFO running, you have a heterodyne frequency meter. That is (at least to
me)
a very different device than an absorption wave meter. I know way to put power
into
a BC-221 and use it as an absorption device.
I’m not in any way saying that the LM or the 221 are less useful. They are
Hi All --
The production batch of TICCs has arrived at TAPR and the first
shipments to customers are going out today. It will probably take
another few days to get them all sent -- there are nearly 100 units
going out the door!
As previously mentioned, the TICCs have been loaded with
You could use it as an absorption wavemeter, in its broadest sense of a passive
tuned circuit with an indicating load. The headphone jack was normally used to
calibrate the VFO against a harmonic of the internal crystal oscillator, but it
could zero beat an external source as well. It
On 2/13/2017 12:56 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Wes: Is this the patent for the IMPATT diode power amplifier?
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3931587
No. As I recall the designer (or at least a prime mover) was a guy named
Eisenhart. The Hughes organization at the time had engineering done
On 02/13/2017 10:35 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
Hi Mike,
First of all, Wow what an interesting read, thanks for sharing
some of the history and your experiences with the 105. A second
thanks for uploading the manual, which I found to be a great
read, as with most old test & measurement product
Yo Ruslan!
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:07:49 -0500
Ruslan Nabioullin wrote:
> Hi, generally speaking, what are the performance differences between
> the following: 1. direct RS-232 (i.e., what I believe is a standard
> PCI card offering RS-232---essentially UARTs interfaced
The BC-221 was the backbone of WW2 communications. How else were all
those sloppy BC-348's and AR-13's set to the called-for frequencies?
Same for shipboard.
Don
On 2017-02-13 13:05, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Bob:
The BC-221 is usually referred to as either a Frequency Meter or a
Heterodyne
Hi Bob:
The BC-221 is usually referred to as either a Frequency Meter or a Heterodyne
Frequency Meter.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
Original Message
Hi
Ok, so how does that make a BC-221 a wave meter?
Hi, generally speaking, what are the performance differences between the
following: 1. direct RS-232 (i.e., what I believe is a standard PCI card
offering RS-232---essentially UARTs interfaced more-or-less directly to
the PCI bus); 2. RS-232 via USB; 3. PPS decoding PCI cards (which might
also
Hi:
Here's a GR 358 wavemeter from the 1920s. Someone noticed the GR logo after I made the web page that led to it's
identification. Hence the generic page URL.
http://www.prc68.com/I/Wavemeter.html
Covers 14 to 220 Meters (21 to 1 MHz) in four bands selected by which inductor
you connect to
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Dan Rae wrote:
> On 2/11/2017 10:08 PM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
>
>> I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
>> how frequency measurement was done before counters.
>>
>> Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated
Surely you just loop it through two counters using a T-piece, with those
counters set to high impedance input, then only terminate the final one?
Peter
On 12 February 2017 at 18:16, gkk gb wrote:
> That is an interesting suggestion (thanks), and would indeed work
19 matches
Mail list logo