Hello time-nuts,
Well, looks like Word does funny things with copy and pasted links. They
all seem to link to picture 9 despite the number in the link. Just correct
the number (9 through 12) and they work.
Regards,
Skip Withrow
___
time-nuts mailing
Hi Skip,
Fantastic 5061 tube photos. Museum quality. Thanks for sharing those with all
of us.
Four coil wires makes sense, but...
1) The small coil around the beam line looks like the "LF coil"; used only for
testing. A brief mention here:
Hello Time-Nits,
Ended up with a little free time and the saw nearby, so did some more
cutting on the cesium beam tube today. Links to some pictures are provided
for your enjoyment.
1. http://207.224.127.233/CsTube/CsTube9.jpg
The first shot shows the new surgery. There is a U shaped
Here's an hour of Thunderbolt data... with labels for the xDEVs. On narrow
screens only the 1-10-100-1000... divisions are labeled and not 1-2-5-10-20...
Otherwise the longer labels run together.
I also enabled the PPS plot which is basically the PPS jitter.
The Star-4 PPS seems to be
You are plotting "offset". This is simply the communications path
delay. It does not measure your system's deviation from UTC. NTP
takes into consideration the offset.
Here is the way to understand what NTP does with offset. Let's say
we lived 200 years ago and wanted to set a grandfather
Sorry, I conflated terms. NTP uses offset and delay differently. In
NTP speak "delay" is the round trip time. "offset" is the difference
from local system clock to reference clock after accounting for delay.
It is like cause by asymmetric trans time.
But still, I think my main point is
Hi
The point is that some chip sets have better access to timer / counters than
others do.
One of the Soekris (sp?) boards is an example of this. We also are moving into
an era where
fairly fancy ARM CPU’s are grafted onto FPGA’s. Once you have that, you are no
longer
dependent on somebody
Hi Bob,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> > On Feb 18, 2017, at 4:53 AM, David J Taylor
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering whether there is some data/information available on the
> > claimed +/- 100 ns jitter?
>
>
> I
Hi
> On Feb 18, 2017, at 4:53 AM, David J Taylor
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering whether there is some data/information available on the
> claimed +/- 100 ns jitter?
I guess the previous was not complete enough.
I routinely measure PPS jitter on GPS
Hi
Let’s back off a bit here.
If the chimney is above the rest of the house, simply putting the antenna a
foot or
two above the chimney will get you past the immediate issues of the house
blocking
or reflecting stuff.
If the top of the chimney has a view to the south down to about 10
I pretty much agree on the fittings, only ones designed for outdoor
and contact with copper. Stainless steel, bronze etc.
I disagree about guy wires, Are you in a area that gets winds and
gusts > 30 mph ? Then I would guy it no matter what, it may even be
code.
Ever get below freezing where you
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is some data/information available on the
claimed +/- 100 ns jitter?
Regarding the PPS -> USB (using the CTS line of a FTDI FT232R), I
plotted, using some lines of Python, the time offset as attached. Just
to get an overview how it is 'worst case', i.e., user
Copper? What an expensive material to use. Galvanized iron pipe is
cheaper and very strong. But even the thinner "type M" copper pipe
is strong enough if it is 1 1/4" diameter.
You should not need guy wires on such a short mast. You will need
likely the proper threaded adaptor to fit the
13 matches
Mail list logo