Re: [time-nuts] Question about frequency counter testing

It appears that I replied to the wrong message, please ignore. Glenn On 5/27/2018 11:52 AM, Oleg Skydan wrote: Hi! From: "Magnus Danielson" You build two sums C and D, one is the phase-samples and the other is phase-samples scaled with their index n in the block.

Re: [time-nuts] Question about frequency counter testing

The MSDS is here: https://simplegreen.com/data-sheets/ They claim that it is non reactive and chemically stable. It is for water tolerant surfaces and should be rinsed. Probably due to the citric acid. Glenn On 5/27/2018 11:52 AM, Oleg Skydan wrote: Hi! From: "Magnus Danielson"

Re: [time-nuts] Question about frequency counter testing

Hi Oleg, On 05/27/2018 05:52 PM, Oleg Skydan wrote: > Hi! > >>> It looks like the proposed method of decimation can be >>> efficiently realized on the current HW. > > I had some free time yesterday and today, so I decided to test the new > algorithms on the real hardware (the HW is still an old

Re: [time-nuts] Question about frequency counter testing

Hi! From: "Magnus Danielson" You build two sums C and D, one is the phase-samples and the other is phase-samples scaled with their index n in the block. From this you can then using the formulas I provided calculate the least-square phase and frequency, and using