Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-19 Thread Mike Suhar
I have participated the past few years mostly with the N8UR multi-op group. My setup is as follows: 1. Receiver: Icom IC-745 or the Yaesu FT-100D (I threatened to use a Hallicrafters SX-25 one year) 2. PC with sound card running DL4YHF's Spectrum Lab for the FFT work. The receiver audio feeds

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread W4wj
In a message dated 10/18/2006 12:26:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The November QST has an announcement for the 2006 Frequency Measuring Test ( www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt - though the 2006 announcement has not made it to the website yet). The object is to determine as

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread Daun Yeagley
I'm planning on it again this year. Daun N8ASB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Knoepfle Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:22 AM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test The November QST has

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Henry Knoepfle wrote: The November QST has an announcement for the 2006 Frequency Measuring Test ( www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt - though the 2006 announcement has not made it to the website yet). The object is to determine as accurately as possible the carrier frequency of a signal sent from W1AW on

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread Doug Millar
Hi John, Very interesting. Do you have any pictures of previous years, etc.? It would be nice to see. Doug At 05:48 AM 10/18/2006, you wrote: Henry Knoepfle wrote: The November QST has an announcement for the 2006 Frequency Measuring Test (

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Yes, I should have put up a link with my other message: http://www.febo.com/time-freq/fmt. In addition to info about my measurement technique and my results from each year's test, there's a link at the bottom of the page to some pictures from the 2003 test. We have some newer ones but I

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread Hal Murray
You might also be interested in the 2005 analysis page (linked from the URL above) -- some statistical analysis indicates that W1AW was actually about 0.4 Hz off in the frequency they reported on 160M. What are the theoretical limits? If I only have N seconds of a signal, that sets a

Re: [time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-18 Thread Didier Juges
I had planned to participate the last 2 years, but got distracted both times. Hopefully, this year will be the charm :-) I better have my GPS stabilized clock working by then (to drive the HP 3586A receiver, and the HP 3570A counter for the decoded audio), no more excuses... Interestingly,

[time-nuts] ARRL 2006 Frequency Measuring Test

2006-10-17 Thread Henry Knoepfle
The November QST has an announcement for the 2006 Frequency Measuring Test ( www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt - though the 2006 announcement has not made it to the website yet). The object is to determine as accurately as possible the carrier frequency of a signal sent from W1AW on the 160m, 80m and 40m