Hi
Output frequency matters quite a bit. What is "good phase noise" at 100 MHz
isn't going to be very impressive at 10 MHz. Frequency offset also matters.
Optimizing for -192 dbc / Hz at 100 KHz offset is a very different thing than
trying for -155 dbc / Hz at 10 Hz offset. You are unlikely to
I do not think I can answer that question the way you present it. It
depends to a large degree on what you want to use it for. If you want to
multiply to microwave frequency there are 100 MHz units out there with
excellent
low phase noise in the $ 400 to $1400 price range, if it is Allan Var
ssion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: [time-nuts] Best OCXOs, phasenoise wise.
>
>
> I'm quite sure someone has went down this road...
> so I better ask first.
>
> Phase noise wise what would be the best OCXO's that we could find
> around, taken f
> Behalf Of Luis Cupido
> > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:02 AM
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> > Subject: [time-nuts] Best OCXOs, phasenoise wise.
> >
> >
> > I'm quite sure someone has went down this road...
> > so I
cise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: [time-nuts] Best OCXOs, phasenoise wise.
>
>
> I'm quite sure someone has went down this road...
> so I better ask first.
>
> Phase noise wise what would be the best OCXO's that
> we could find around, taken from equipments
I'm quite sure someone has went down this road...
so I better ask first.
Phase noise wise what would be the best OCXO's that
we could find around, taken from equipments, or ebay
etc.
I have in mind essentially the HP ones. the PIEZZO
ISOTEMP, CMAK, Vecton(harder to find) and some of the small
wen
