Hi, Brooke,
Very interesting stuff. Thanks for the link. Question - Is any of
the older chirp sounder equipment now available on the surplus
market?? Thanks.
... MartinVE3OAT
On 02/07/2016 12:00, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:
Hi Mike:
For quite a while I was heavily into
On 7/1/16 9:04 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Mike:
For quite a while I was heavily into "chirp" transmissions. These are
HF ionosphere radio transmissions that sweep from 2 to 30 MHz at 100
kHz/sec.
In order to "tune" the radio to a specific station (you can not tune by
frequency) you need to
Hi Mike:
For quite a while I was heavily into "chirp" transmissions. These are HF ionosphere radio transmissions that sweep from
2 to 30 MHz at 100 kHz/sec.
In order to "tune" the radio to a specific station (you can not tune by frequency) you need to know the start time
schedule for that
Hi
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 3:40 AM, Mike Cook wrote:
>
>
>> Le 29 juin 2016 à 22:18, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :
>>
>>
>> In message <20160629192850.19c29406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal
>> Mu
>> rray writes:
>>
At one point
> Le 29 juin 2016 à 22:18, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :
>
>
> In message <20160629192850.19c29406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal
> Mu
> rray writes:
>
>>> At one point they were looking into making a GPS time receiver where the
>>> cable length
The 1503 was Tek's long-line (10km) TDR analyzer. IIRC, it put
haversine pulses of about 5v onto the line under test (~10v open
circuit). The 1502 (~600m line length) put pulses of about 200mV onto
the line under test (~400mV open circuit).
Best regards,
Charles
Scott wrote:
This is
On 6/30/16 5:52 PM, Tim Shoppa wrote:
We are all time nuts, so there's an obvious answer: What you do, is raise
the GPS up to a height the same as the cable length. You then drop it,
measure the time until it hits the ground, and use d = 0.5 a * t * t to
calculate d. Then you correct for the
We are all time nuts, so there's an obvious answer: What you do, is raise
the GPS up to a height the same as the cable length. You then drop it,
measure the time until it hits the ground, and use d = 0.5 a * t * t to
calculate d. Then you correct for the velocity factor.
Tim N3QE
On Wed, Jun 29,
This is highly dependent on the TDR especially ones designed for long twisted
pair runs where a high voltage pulse is used to overcome resistive losses
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 10:59 AM, David wrote:
>
> The Tektronix 1502 uses a tunnel diode
I'd say it depends on the Time Nut . NVP X Distance will get you close and
for a beginning time nut is a worthwhile exercise
To improve delay calculations now you need instrumentation that not all
especially beginning time nuts own.I've got a 20 Ghz Agilent scope/TDR
along with a 110
As a practical matter, in the lab we seldom need a cable delay
measured to better than +/- 0.5 ns, which we usually do as a time
interval measurement, with a 1 pps into a tee on channel A of a TIC
and then the cable from the tee to channel B.
For cables up to 40 m or so, just measuring the
Scott wrote:
When using a TDR its best if cable is unterminated as the discontinuity at the
end is helpful as a marker.
Someone else previously asked how you're expected to do TDR on a GPS
antenna cable since everything is matched (therefore, presumably, no
reflections).
There are ALWAYS
On 30 June 2016 at 09:19, Scott McGrath wrote:
> If the nominal velocity of propagation is known and length is known delay
> is easily determined mathematically
>
Except that coax does not have a uniform impedance or velocity factor. Both
will vary as a function of position
The Tektronix 1502 uses a tunnel diode pulser to produce a 50
picosecond output step of about 200 millivolts. There is a misprint
in the theory section of the service manual which says "400 V" instead
of "400mV".
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 04:19:43 -0400, you wrote:
>If the nominal velocity of
If the nominal velocity of propagation is known and length is known delay is
easily determined mathematically
Time Domain Reflectrometry is the usual technique for finding cable length but
even there the cables NVP is an essential parameter if you want to compute
length but not essential in
Yo Poul-Henning!
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:18:49 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> >How would you do that?
>
> TDR ?
>
> If it wasn't behind a choke, the inrush current to the antenna
> preamp power filtering capacitor could be measured, but the choke
> ruins that.
>
>
In message <20160629151528.543f4...@spidey.rellim.com>, "Gary E. Miller" writes
:
>It works on live ethernet cables, so it can't be too harsh.
Ethernet is incredibly robust, to the tune of a couple hundred volts
pretty much any way you can connect it.
Most GPS antenna preamps will
Yo Poul-Henning!
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:57:30 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> Most GPS antenna preamps will croak before you get up to 10V.
The Fluke TDR is 4V max:
Some of the cheap gigabit network cards can and with surprising accuracy
On 29 Jun 2016 22:02, "Gary E. Miller" wrote:
> Yo Hal!
>
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:28:50 -0700
> Hal Murray wrote:
>
> > bro...@pacific.net said:
> > > At one point they were
Am 29.06.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Gary E. Miller:
TDR. The GPS already sends a voltage down the cable to power the
antenna. Send a sharp down the cable and see when the reflection comes
back.
Even some of my cheap managed ethernet switches can do that.
What reflection? If the antenna preamp
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:18:49 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> If it wasn't behind a choke, the inrush current to the antenna
> preamp power filtering capacitor could be measured, but the choke
> ruins that.
>
> The trouble is how to do it without frying the antenna
Am Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:28:50 -0700
schrieb Hal Murray :
>
> bro...@pacific.net said:
> > At one point they were looking into making a GPS time receiver
> > where the cable length calibration would be built-in.
>
> How would you do that?
>
> The obvious way is to
In message <20160629192850.19c29406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal Mu
rray writes:
>> At one point they were looking into making a GPS time receiver where the
>> cable length calibration would be built-in.
>
>How would you do that?
TDR ?
If it wasn't behind a choke, the
possible.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces+greg.dowd=microsemi@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Hal Murray
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 12:29 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Cable length
Yo Hal!
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:28:50 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> bro...@pacific.net said:
> > At one point they were looking into making a GPS time receiver
> > where the cable length calibration would be built-in.
>
> How would you do that?
TDR. The GPS already
Hi Hal:
I think the cal process is essentially a time domain reflection measure of cable length. The GPS receiver and the cable
cal hardware would be in the antenna unit.
The 1 PPS signal would be aligned at the output of the cable.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
bro...@pacific.net said:
> At one point they were looking into making a GPS time receiver where the
> cable length calibration would be built-in.
How would you do that?
The obvious way is to compare the time you get with a known-good time, but if
you had that, why would you want this new GPS
27 matches
Mail list logo