Cambridge University Press, which is a non-profit company.
I am unsure of the relevance of the above statement but, being
pedantic (as befits time-nuts):
Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge
[see http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/univ/so/so_statj.pdf], and the
Martyn,
designing a Cs standard is not the job for a single man,
yet I might help you to find frustrated scientists who worked
on a Cs project (some 10 years ago I took a part in a project,
designing damn impossible precision electronics).
About the noise of your quartz oscillator, not bad.
Yet:
Hi,
Is there anyone out there clever enough to design me a cesium frequency
standard??
There's only two manufacturers that I know of and there's room for another
supplier.
Also you may be interested to read we have just developed what we believe to be
the worlds lowest close-in phase noise
Why do you say there's room for another supplier?
5 years ago there were 3 suppliers, but Agilent
sold out to Symmetricom. What unmet need are you
proposing to fill?
What is the short term stability (sigma-sub-y-of-tau)
of your world class oscillator?
Rick Karlquist
(RF designer for the 5071A
Martyn Smith wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyone out there clever enough to design me a cesium frequency
standard??
There's only two manufacturers that I know of and there's room for another
supplier.
Also you may be interested to read we have just developed what we believe to
be the worlds
It sounds like a really nice oscillator. I'm sure that everyone would
love to hear about the challenges and tradeoffs in designing such a high
performance quartz oscillator.
Do you guys cut your own crystals? How much of the improvement comes
from a better SC-cut crystal and how much from
