e time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal from
> aGPSreceiver.
>
> Hi
>
> I'm sure they expect you to take out the sawtooth error before you do the
> comparison. Are you doing that?
>
> Bob
>
> On Sep 13,
ubject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal from
aGPSreceiver.
Hi
I'm sure they expect you to take out the sawtooth error before you do the
comparison. Are you doing that?
Bob
On Sep 13, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Reilley wrote:
> I see in the Trimble Resolution T data s
> The cables are not exactly the same lengths. Differences in length
> will result in a fixed offset. I am not concerned about such fixed
> errors, only jitter.
>
> I am comparing the rising edges which is what the spec defines as the
> reference edge.
>
> Pete.
Pete,
Correct, the survey p
expected.
Bob
From: Tom Van Baak
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal from
aGPSreceiver.
Pete, Bob,
For data on a Resolution-T th
Pete, Bob,
For data on a Resolution-T that I tested see http://leapsecond.com/pages/res-t/
What I found: the raw 1PPS has a standard deviation of about 13 ns; with
sawtooth correction that drops to about 6 ns. If that sounds too good to be
true, I can double check the raw data, or even re-run t
