If i'm not wrong, virtually ALL GPS modules have their
timing standardized on the RISING edge and do NOT
guarantee anything about the falling edge.
Glenn's measurements confirm that fact... Ideally, to
get sure the users will use the rising edge, that
signal shall be a sawtooth!!! (or simpler: a
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Normand Martel
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:40 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Falling Edge Error
If i'm not wrong, virtually ALL GPS modules have their timing
standardized on the RISING edge and do
From: Randy Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Falling Edge Error
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:00:35 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys,
Randy,
Maybe it would be better to call it the leading edge?
It got my vote at least. ;O)
I have actually
sent out a couple of our
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Magnus Danielson wri
tes:
Randy,
Maybe it would be better to call it the leading edge?
We had a long discussion about this when we wrote RFC2783.
We settled on calling the two edges assert and clear because
any other words we could find were overloaded with
