In article <008d01c9a78b$6f7374a0$9d83e...@newiw112a268qp>, Rich and
Marcia Putz writes
>Thanks John, yes I'm real.
>The 1978 date is correct, I'm looking for the article to quote. Prior to the
>decree, France maintained a roughly twelve and a half minute offset. I always
>was struck by this as
> -Original Message-
> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
> [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] French Time offset
Michael Sokolov skrev:
> "Lux, James P" wrote:
>
>> Things get done for funny reasons: After all, the physical size of France is
>> why ATM "cells" (packets) are 53 bytes (48 byte payload) instead of either 32
>> byte or 64 byte payloads.
>
> Huh? Can you please elaborate? I thought the 48 oct
Lux, James P skrev:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
>> [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Louis Oneto
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:14 AM
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>
In message:
"Lux, James P" writes:
:
: >
: > Actually, there this paper:
: >
: > http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/seago.pdf
: >
: > says that the delta was 9 minutes and 20 seconds (see page
: > 10) Historic Universal Time (GMT) in France.
: >
: > Warner
: >
:
: 9 min 20
>
> Actually, there this paper:
>
> http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/seago.pdf
>
> says that the delta was 9 minutes and 20 seconds (see page
> 10) Historic Universal Time (GMT) in France.
>
> Warner
>
9 min 20 sec = 9.333 mins = 0.155 hours = 2.33 degrees of longitude = 2 deg 20
min l
and frequency measurement
: > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] French Time offset
: >
: > BIPM is an _international_ organisation, and apart to be in
: > France, has nothing to do (and never had as far as I know)
: > with the definition of French legal time. At least no more
: > th
> -Original Message-
> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
> [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Michael Sokolov
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: time-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] French Time offset
>
> "Lux, James
"Lux, James P" wrote:
> Things get done for funny reasons: After all, the physical size of France is
> why ATM "cells" (packets) are 53 bytes (48 byte payload) instead of either 32
> byte or 64 byte payloads.
Huh? Can you please elaborate? I thought the 48 octets of payload were
a compromise b
> -Original Message-
> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
> [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Louis Oneto
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:14 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] French Time offs
"
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] French Time offset
>
>
>
> On 3/17/09 10:35 PM, "Rich and Marcia Putz" wrote:
>
>> Thanks John, yes I'm real.
>>
On 3/17/09 10:35 PM, "Rich and Marcia Putz" wrote:
> Thanks John, yes I'm real.
> The 1978 date is correct, I'm looking for the article to quote. Prior to the
> decree, France maintained a roughly twelve and a half minute offset. I always
> was struck by this as the BIPM is located in France,
ot;Rich and Marcia Putz"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:35 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] French Time offset
> Thanks John, yes I'm real.
> The 1978 date is correct, I'm looking for the article to quote. Prior to
> the decree, France maintained a roughly twelve and a half m
Thanks John, yes I'm real.
The 1978 date is correct, I'm looking for the article to quote. Prior to the
decree, France maintained a roughly twelve and a half minute offset. I always
was struck by this as the BIPM is located in France, and has been for many
years. Disagreement on the location o
14 matches
Mail list logo
