Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811

2010-10-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
I think you should probably be fine at 18V. The oven will run down to at least 15V and maybe 12V. Rick Karlquist N6RK On 10/19/2010 5:27 AM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote: I plan on replacing the Xtal Osc. of my HP 5062C with a HP 10811 since I have a few ones with AV less than 1E-12 from 1 to 100

[time-nuts] HP 10811

2010-10-19 Thread EWKehren
I plan on replacing the Xtal Osc. of my HP 5062C with a HP 10811 since I have a few ones with AV less than 1E-12 from 1 to 100 sec. I would like to use the +18 Volt in the unit for heater. Has any one experience with running the 10811 below 20 Volt, any thing I should look out for? Thanks

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Rick Karlquist
Bruce Griffiths wrote: >> One concern is: > How accurate does one' thermometer which one uses to calibrate the > thermistor bridge setpoint have to be? > > Bruce The thermistors HP used were quite accurate, so you didn't need a thermometer. You just calculated the correct resistor value for the t

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Dan Rae wrote: > Bruce Griffiths wrote: > >> Meanwhile, before posting a correction I was trying to find data on the >> oven setpoint temperature tolerance. >> >> The relevant HP Journal with an article on the HP10811A is: >> http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1981-03.pdf >> >> One c

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Dan Rae
Bruce Griffiths wrote: > Meanwhile, before posting a correction I was trying to find data on the > oven setpoint temperature tolerance. > > The relevant HP Journal with an article on the HP10811A is: > http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1981-03.pdf > > One concern is: > How accurate doe

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Rick Karlquist wrote: > Bruce Griffiths wrote: > >> Dan >> >> The real reasons that this part is labelled non replaceable are >> >> 1) its epoxied to the oven. >> >> 2) Setting R20 to the correct value actually requires plotting the OCXO >> frequency vs R20 and selecting R20 so that the OCXO fre

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Rick Karlquist
Bruce Griffiths wrote: >> > Dan > > The real reasons that this part is labelled non replaceable are > > 1) its epoxied to the oven. > > 2) Setting R20 to the correct value actually requires plotting the OCXO > frequency vs R20 and selecting R20 so that the OCXO frequency is located > at the station

Re: [time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Dan Rae wrote: > The 10811-60111 that came in my 5370B counter turned out to have an open > circuit Thermistor in it. This is a "non-replaceable" part in theory. > > However, nothing to lose, I have successfully substituted a Digikey Part > number: 317-1371 100 kOhm 1% Thermistor ( from Cantherm

[time-nuts] -hp- 10811 repair (Thermistor)

2009-01-22 Thread Dan Rae
The 10811-60111 that came in my 5370B counter turned out to have an open circuit Thermistor in it. This is a "non-replaceable" part in theory. However, nothing to lose, I have successfully substituted a Digikey Part number: 317-1371 100 kOhm 1% Thermistor ( from Cantherm, part number: MF51B104

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60158 and LPRO-101 on Ebay

2008-07-14 Thread Jürg Kögel
The LOCXO ist the oven monitor. See on the manual 10811A/B Juerg ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] HP 10811-60158 and LPRO-101 on Ebay

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Sims
The seller of this 10811's on Ebay has raised his price to 80 bucks a pop. He also is now listing LPRO-101 rubidiums for $99 (half of what everybody else wants). Also, on his pictures of the connectors, one pin is labeled LOCXO. What is this signal?

Re: [time-nuts] HP-10811 comming up to speed

2007-02-18 Thread Connie Marshall
ent Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP-10811 comming up to speed Hi Connie, Interesting way to use Spectrum Lab (I suppose?) Didier KO4BB Connie Marshall wrote: > Here is a shot of my HP-10811 comming up from a cold start. The power was > applied at 01:41:00. Although this graph does not show it

Re: [time-nuts] HP-10811 comming up to speed

2007-02-18 Thread Didier Juges
Hi Connie, Interesting way to use Spectrum Lab (I suppose?) Didier KO4BB Connie Marshall wrote: > Here is a shot of my HP-10811 comming up from a cold start. The power was > applied at 01:41:00. Although this graph does not show it, the osc was about > .05Hz low after three hours. > > Connie >

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage"

2007-02-02 Thread Bill Jones, K8CU
Jones, K8CU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:45 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage" > You may try a replacement crystal from Jason Kutz. I remember him saying he &g

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage"

2007-02-02 Thread Bill Jones, K8CU
: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage" > You need a parallel resonant crystal (~20 pF) at 10 MHz. > If you get a series resonant one, it will be high in frequency > in the 10811. > > Rick Karlquist N6RK > > > > > Scott N

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage"

2007-02-02 Thread Rick Karlquist
You need a parallel resonant crystal (~20 pF) at 10 MHz. If you get a series resonant one, it will be high in frequency in the 10811. Rick Karlquist N6RK Scott Newell wrote: > At 03:45 PM 2/2/2007 -0500, Mark Amos wrote: >> >>Now I know that it won't be as stable as the original fancy SC-cut >

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage"

2007-02-02 Thread Scott Newell
At 03:45 PM 2/2/2007 -0500, Mark Amos wrote: > >Now I know that it won't be as stable as the original fancy SC-cut crystal from HP, but it might be stable >enough to use as a non-critical bench oscillator for experimenting, etc. I'll keep it running for a while Hey, you might bug Chuck Wenzel.

[time-nuts] HP 10811 "salvage"

2007-02-02 Thread Mark Amos
Some time ago, I complained to the list about an HP 10811 from e-bay that was under frequency (apparently it was a non-production unit that somehow made it out of the factory along with a bunch of other somewhat- less-than-production units.) I figured it was a lost cause, so I took it apart jus

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Jack Hudler
Good stuff thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hoover Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 1:22 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout (This info may be in the archive, I think, but maybe it

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Christopher Hoover
(This info may be in the archive, I think, but maybe it came up on the TAPR time-freq list and is in that archive instead. Google site search is your friend.) The cross for the 10811 connector with HP 4x4 P/N 1251-2035 is definitively to Vishay/Dale EB81-BN15TGW. There are a number of variant

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Jason Rabel
easurement' > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout > > Yep I'm looking at it right now and yes it has eyelets. > > http://www.hudler.org/pub/IMG_4586.JPG > > Jack > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Jack Hudler
ECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Rabel Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:46 AM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout Are you sure about that part number? I'm using edac: 357-030-520-202 It's the pins (vs the eyel

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Jack Hudler
frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout Are you sure about that part number? I'm using edac: 357-030-520-202 It's the pins (vs the eyelets), but also the row-to-row spacing is .200mm, and your model number is .140mm. Do both fit I guess? I couldn&#x

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Jason Rabel
Are you sure about that part number? I'm using edac: 357-030-520-202 It's the pins (vs the eyelets), but also the row-to-row spacing is .200mm, and your model number is .140mm. Do both fit I guess? I couldn't find info on the old CINC connector so I just got out my caliper and started taking mea

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Further to my previous reply, the HP Archive website has an Operating & Service Manual for the 10811A/B at: http://www.hparchive.com/Manuals/HP-10811AB-Manual.pdf In section 2.20 on the page numbered 8 (actually the sixteenth page in the PDF), a 15-pin Cinch connector is described.

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agilent have a "Product Overview" PDF for the 10811E/D on their website: http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5091-1639E.pdf which has a pinout. Hopefully they will have stuck to the same pinout. Peter > Hello, > > I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one m

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Didier Juges
It would be helpful to know who this seller is. Thanks in advance. Didier KO4BB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one month ago and it > was just delivered today. Seller promised to send edge connector and > pinouts, but now refuses

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-13 Thread Richard W. Solomon
s@febo.com >Subject: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout > >Hello, > >I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one month ago and it >was just delivered today. Seller promised to send edge connector and pinouts, >but now refuses to send pinout and another i

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-12 Thread David Kirkby
7 3:17:47 AM To: "time-nuts@febo.com" Subject: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout Hello, I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one month ago and it was just delivered today. Seller promised to send edge connector and pinouts, but now refuses to

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-12 Thread Jack Hudler
ECTED] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:18 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout Hello, I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one month ago and it was just delivered today. Seller promised to send edge connector and pinouts, but now refuses to

[time-nuts] HP 10811-60155 pinout

2007-01-12 Thread stork3264
Hello, I purchased one of the HP 10811-60155 standards on ebay one month ago and it was just delivered today. Seller promised to send edge connector and pinouts, but now refuses to send pinout and another item. I am unable to test the standard. This has been a difficult transaction and I wis

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Gary Chatters
Jason Rabel wrote: > The 10544's (without any letter after them) output just 1MHz, correct? > > I'm pretty sure I've seen a 10544 on eBay lately, I don't remember the > price. If that plugs into the 5245 without an adapter board or anything that > might be the easiest way to go. > > Jason > No

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Robert Crawford
Poul-Henning, Indeed. A fine bit of work on this very subject is seen here: http://www.realhamradio.com/z3801a-turning-point.htm Be sure to look at their previous article as well. Bob Crawford Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Crawford writes: > > > >>There i

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Crawford writes: >There is a great article on the 10811 in the March 1981 issue of HP Journal: > >http://www.hparchive.com/Journals/Low-Resolution/HPJ-1981-03-Low-Resolution.pdf I had never gotten around to read that one, but now I did. It sounds to me like

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Tom Van Baak
Yes, the 10544 is 10 MHz. But the original tin can oscillator in the 5245-series was 1 MHz. That's why the 10544-based retrofit kit mentioned earlier divided the 10 MHz down by 10. /tvb ___ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Robert Crawford
Jason, I'm fairly certain the 10544 is a 10 MHz oscillator. The 10811 is an improved version with way better performance and it can usually plug into the same connector. There is a great article on the 10811 in the March 1981 issue of HP Journal: http://www.hparchive.com/Journals/Low-Resoluti

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-12 Thread Jason Rabel
The 10544's (without any letter after them) output just 1MHz, correct? I'm pretty sure I've seen a 10544 on eBay lately, I don't remember the price. If that plugs into the 5245 without an adapter board or anything that might be the easiest way to go. Jason > Maybe it was from a 5245L. I have

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-11 Thread Dave Brown
necessary. DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Christopher Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:20 PM Subject: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO > Hi folks. > > > > Anyone have the specs for HP 10811-60105 OCXO?It is not

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-11 Thread Gary Chatters
David Forbes version=3.1.7 wrote: > At 7:20 PM -0800 12/11/06, Christopher Hoover wrote: > >> Hi folks. >> >> Anyone have the specs for HP 10811-60105 OCXO?It is not listed in the >> Mejia-Norton document. It was supposedly removed from a 5245. >> >> I'm also looking for a schematic for the

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-11 Thread Jason Rabel
> Anyone have the specs for HP 10811-60105 OCXO?It is not listed in the > Mejia-Norton document. It was supposedly removed from a 5245. All the official specs, including the 60105: http://www.hparchive.com/Manuals/HP-10811AB-Manual.pdf There's another PDF for the 10811 models (HP10811-Spec

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-11 Thread David Forbes
At 7:20 PM -0800 12/11/06, Christopher Hoover wrote: >Hi folks. > >Anyone have the specs for HP 10811-60105 OCXO?It is not listed in the >Mejia-Norton document. It was supposedly removed from a 5245. > >I'm also looking for a schematic for the aux board/assembly p/n 05245-60033, >also supposed

[time-nuts] HP 10811-60105 OCXO

2006-12-11 Thread Christopher Hoover
Hi folks. Anyone have the specs for HP 10811-60105 OCXO?It is not listed in the Mejia-Norton document. It was supposedly removed from a 5245. I'm also looking for a schematic for the aux board/assembly p/n 05245-60033, also supposedly from a 5245. It has a rectifier, video amp and de

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-26 Thread Javier
Hello, A bit out of topic... but I've a HP 5334A with standard timebase, and I would like to upgrade it with a 10811 I'have. Unfortunately, I don't have the service manual for this counter, and I've seen that it needs a small board for mounting the OCXO. Anyone has the service manual for this

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-26 Thread Bjorn Gabrielsson
Hejsan Flemming, The old timebase was a TCXO on a small board sitting in the same slot, where the OCXO now is. Its an 5342A Microwave Counter. Not really perfect for high resolution 10MHz work. I do have manuals for the 5342A and the old 5328A - should anyone need information about above models.

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-24 Thread Flemming Larsen
Hej Bjorn, Which model HP counter are you upgrading? In some models it is necessary to disable the standard timebase, when upgrading to an option 010 OCXO. -- Flemming Larsen --- Bjorn Gabrielsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Works perfectly. Wonder what the 25 year old counter > thinks ab

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-24 Thread Bjorn Gabrielsson
"Tom Van Baak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is it a problem to put a 10811 in a HP counter supposed > > to use the older 10544A? > > No problem. It will work correctly. The 10811 > was designed to be backwards compatible > with instruments designed for the 105444. > > What you usually can't d

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-23 Thread Tom Van Baak
> Is it a problem to put a 10811 in a HP counter supposed > to use the older 10544A? No problem. It will work correctly. The 10811 was designed to be backwards compatible with instruments designed for the 105444. What you usually can't do it put a 10544 in a counter expecting a 10811. /tvb __

Re: [time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-23 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Bjorn Gabrielsson wrote: >Is it a problem to put a 10811 in a HP counter supposed to use the >older 10544A? > >-- >Björn > > The pinouts of the two units aren't quite identical, but are pretty similar and it's possible to retrofit the 10811A as you suggest. I don't have the details at the t

[time-nuts] HP 10811 vs HP 10544A

2005-06-23 Thread Bjorn Gabrielsson
Is it a problem to put a 10811 in a HP counter supposed to use the older 10544A? -- Björn ___ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

<    1   2