Hi Adam,
OK, good to hear about the progress. Let us know about what you learn
and if you need additional input. I'm curious what is the cause of this
error.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 06/03/2018 04:09 AM, Adam MacDonald wrote:
> Thanks Gents,
> I ran the additional tests recommended by Poul and Magnus a
Thanks Gents,
I ran the additional tests recommended by Poul and Magnus and I concur that the
interpolator board is not the likely culprit. I reversed the input cables as
well as the pods in separate experiments to rule out those contributors with no
different results. I thought it may be a tr
On 5/31/2018 10:00 AM,
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
PS: I do not recall it being mentioned, but the 1 MOhm input pods are
horribly unstable compared to the 50 Ohm input pods, which are
basically just a stripline and a BNC connector.
One thing to note about all the 5372A pods: They should all
In message , Magnus D
anielson writes:
>Consider that you need to swap the cables to verify that it is static
>with the setup and does not follow the cables.
Run long series of measurements with the HP5372A OCXO free-running
and with it slaved to the DUT clock.
Any imperfection in the
Hi Adam,
On 05/30/2018 12:26 AM, Adam MacDonald wrote:
> Time Nuts,
> I have a nice new-to-me 5372A that I'd like to use as part of a DMTD
> stability analysis system. After getting a few odd glitches from a very
> stable source spaced 2 ns above or below the main time interval reading,
OK, so
Time Nuts,
I have a nice new-to-me 5372A that I'd like to use as part of a DMTD stability
analysis system. After getting a few odd glitches from a very stable source
spaced 2 ns above or below the main time interval reading, I decided to run the
performance verification checkout from the servic
