Re: [time-nuts] House subcommittee Democrats Urge Finding a Way for LightSquared and GPS Users to Co-Exist

2011-09-20 Thread Brian Garrett
I still can't understand how this ever got to be such a big deal, or why it continues to be. Even if the military weren't involved, the FCC has always been the 500-pound gorilla cracking down on everybody from drunken ham operators to national networks and 2-second wardrobe malfunctions. Why

Re: [time-nuts] House subcommittee Democrats Urge Finding a Way for LightSquared and GPS Users to Co-Exist

2011-09-20 Thread J. Forster
That is precisely why the questions are important. Somehow, Falcone was able to morph a low-impact satellite service into this monster with 40,000 powerful L-Band transmitters blanketing the country. And he could not have done it without powerful help. So who and how matters, a lot. As I said,

Re: [time-nuts] House subcommittee Democrats Urge Finding a Way for LightSquared and GPS Users to Co-Exist

2011-09-20 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
Brian wrote: the FCC has always been the 500-pound gorilla cracking down on everybody from drunken ham operators to national networks and 2-second wardrobe malfunctions. Why don't the FCC and the Navy just get together and say, screw you, LightSquared As I have said here several times,

Re: [time-nuts] House subcommittee Democrats Urge Finding a Way for LightSquared and GPS Users to Co-Exist

2011-09-20 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
In my opinion, the only real solution is a fiber optic build out. The bandwidth is fantastic and the technology appears to be quite sound. Unlike BPL or wireless networks, Fiber optic internet does not pollute the RF spectrum. Save the RF spectrum for the odd domicile that is off the electric