Moin Rick,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:20:09 -0700
Rick Karlquist rich...@karlquist.com wrote:
Volker Esper wrote:
I have been looking into low jitter triggers for sampling systems
recently and will probably end up using a discrete differential
amplifier driving ECL logic.
Why discrete?
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:40:29 +0200, Volker Esper ail...@t-online.de
wrote:
Am 17.04.2013 15:23, schrieb David:
...
I have been looking into low jitter triggers for sampling systems
recently and will probably end up using a discrete differential
amplifier driving ECL logic.
Why discrete?
Hi
The description from their tech guys is Very high gain front end. It's a
saturating amp rather than a comparator.
Sample boards arrived yesterday, it'll be interesting to see how it does.
Bob
On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist rich...@karlquist.com
wrote:
On
On 4/17/13 4:26 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
The description from their tech guys is Very high gain front end. It's a saturating
amp rather than a comparator.
I thought the whole point of fast ECL logic was that it never saturated.
Of course these days, one might have very fast saturating logic
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:26:46 -0400, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist rich...@karlquist.com
wrote:
On 4/14/2013 7:48 AM, Brian Davis wrote:
Not sure if it's already been mentioned, but Linear has introduced a new
part that looks interesting :
In some of my projects I like to use the MC10EL16. Does any one have an
opinion on it?
Bert Kehren
In a message dated 4/17/2013 9:31:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
davidwh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:26:46 -0400, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:51
Very high gain front end. It's a saturating amp rather than a
comparator.
Wonder how it would work as a DMTD front end?
Corby
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
Am 17.04.2013 15:23, schrieb David:
...
I have been looking into low jitter triggers for sampling systems
recently and will probably end up using a discrete differential
amplifier driving ECL logic.
Why discrete?
___
time-nuts mailing list --
-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jim Lux
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:20 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
On 4/17/13 4:26 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
The description from their tech guys is Very high gain
] On
Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:24 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:26:46 -0400, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Richard (Rick
AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
In some of my projects I like to use the MC10EL16. Does any one have an
opinion on it?
Bert Kehren
In a message dated 4/17/2013 9:31:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
davidwh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed
...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of cdel...@juno.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:31 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
Very high gain front end. It's a saturating amp rather than a
comparator.
Wonder how it would work as a DMTD front end?
Corby
ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
In some of my projects I like to use the MC10EL16. Does any one have an
opinion on it?
Bert Kehren
I have used the MC10X116 series of line receivers going back to the old
MC1000 family, which went out of production 35 years ago. The MC10EL16
should have been called
Volker Esper wrote:
I have been looking into low jitter triggers for sampling systems
recently and will probably end up using a discrete differential
amplifier driving ECL logic.
Why discrete?
ECL style circuits on IC's suffer from high noise in the current
source. If you go discrete, you
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:24 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:26
On 4/14/2013 7:48 AM, Brian Davis wrote:
Not sure if it's already been mentioned, but Linear has introduced a new
part that looks interesting :
LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
http://www.linear.com/product/LTC6957-1
This is VERY interesting, especially the low noise PECL output. I have
Not sure if it's already been mentioned, but Linear has introduced a
new part that looks interesting :
LTC6957 Low Phase Noise Buffer/Driver
http://www.linear.com/product/LTC6957-1
From the product blurb:
The LTC6957 will buffer and distribute any logic signal with minimal
additive noise,
17 matches
Mail list logo
