Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-13 Thread David J Taylor
What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run about 30' from my GPS antenna to a TBolt. Best, Dick If the antenna has a pre-amp, then just use satellite TV cable, even though the losses and impedance aren't quite what you might like. Cheers, David GM8ARV -- SatSignal

[time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Dick Moore
What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run about 30' from my GPS antenna to a TBolt. Best, Dick ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Richard W. Solomon
If your antenna has a preamp, then most any coax will do, but if you must, try LMR-240. 73, Dick, W1KSZ -Original Message- From: Dick Moore rich...@hughes.net Sent: Jun 12, 2011 12:33 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable? What's the best small diameter (0.25

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Rob Kimberley
We used to use RG-9 at Odetics/Zyfer. What gain is your antenna? Rob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Dick Moore Sent: 12 June 2011 8:34 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable? What's the best

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread WB6BNQ
High Dick, Without giving away the bank, the LMR series of coax is pretty good. But in reality a high quality version of the RG-6 Cable TV coax used by the better Cable companies is quite acceptable. If your local Cable company is one of those, you can usually tag one of the work trucks and

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread William H. Fite
LMR-240 is a good choice. Attenuation is ~10dB/100'. But if you can tolerate larger diameter, LMR-400 will cut that in half. On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Dick Moore rich...@hughes.net wrote: What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run about 30' from my GPS

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
I got a T-bolt from i.fluke. The antenna came with a length of 50 ohm rg58. I added 75' of TV style rg6 and it works fine with no amplification needed beyond that in the antenna. It did not seem to mind the 50 to 75 oh mismatch. I did notice with the first T-bolt I got that it could not see

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
Dick wrote: What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? How nuts do you want to get? You shouldn't need anything better than a good RG-59 (75 ohms) for a 30' run. For that, I'd probably use Belden 1426A if I were restricted to 0.25. Good foam RG-6 (also 75 ohms) like Belden

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Hal Murray
rich...@hughes.net said: What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run about 30' from my GPS antenna to a TBolt. There are two sources of attenuation. One is the dielectric losses. The other is resistance, primarily skin effect on the center conductor. Most modern

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Dave Brown
- From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable? rich...@hughes.net said: What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Jim Lux
On 6/12/11 7:57 PM, Dave Brown wrote: For a given OD the centre conductor will be SMALLER diameter for 75 ohm cable wrpt 50 ohm cable. Google for the whole minimum loss/highest power xfer capability etc issue as regards coax cable diameter and impedance. All std textbook stuff. Or used to be!

Re: [time-nuts] Lowloss cable?

2011-06-12 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Dick Moore rich...@hughes.net wrote: What's the best small diameter (0.25) low loss coax? I need to run about 30' from my GPS antenna to a TBolt. Low loss and a 0.25 diameter don't go together. The loss generally depends on the diameter. The way to figure