Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread iov...@inwind.it
I would disagree. The traffic on the FE-5680A took some of the group's bandwidth only in the recent weeks in coincidence with the appearance of cheap units on the auction site. Why to force time-nuts to jump to and fro one group and another? I have only been a member of the time-nuts group for

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
I would disagree. The traffic on the FE-5680A took some of the group's bandwidth only in the recent weeks in coincidence with the appearance of cheap units on the auction site. Why to force time-nuts to jump to and fro one group and another? And some of us will not use yahoo lists, based

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Javier Herrero
Me too. I think that this is a transient that will surely decay... and that also is leading to several constructive sub-threads that are not directly related with the FE-5680A but nevertheless very interesting and very time-nut related. I'm not interested to subscribe another list that

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Marco IK1ODO -2
No new groups please, the Rb thread is interesting for time-nuts, and I don't see the need. 73 - Marco IK1ODO ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Alan Melia
but I have the feeling that Group spawning is an ego thing Alan G3NYK - Original Message - From: Rich (Buckeye) kq...@bex.net To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:57 PM Subject: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group I have only been a member

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Mike Naruta AA8K
I created a spam filter for anything with 5680 so I don't see all those posts. On 02/02/2012 08:57 AM, Rich (Buckeye) wrote: I have only been a member of the time-nuts group for a short while. It seems like 75% of the posts here have to do with the

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread EB4APL
I indeed created a filter to send them to another folder so I keep both and have all about the 5680A grouped. On 02/02/2012 16:07, Mike Naruta AA8K wrote: I created a spam filter for anything with 5680 so I don't see all those posts. On 02/02/2012 08:57 AM, Rich (Buckeye) wrote: I have

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Chris Albertson
If anyone wants all the FE5580A mail to go to one place make a filter in you email reader. Tell it to place anything sent from the TN list with FE5680 in the hearer or text to go into a special folder or otherwise be tagged as fe5680 related. I think this happens all the time -- people talk

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Tom Van Baak
I have only been a member of the time-nuts group for a short while. It seems like 75% of the posts here have to do with the FE-5680A Rubidium Frequency Standards and there use and modification. This seems like the most popular subject and takes up allot of the group's bandwidth. Hi Rich,

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread Bill Hawkins
Staying on the topic of the thread, I also found the list clogging up with fixes for a cheap rubidium device (wouldn't call it a standard). Outlook told me that there were 10,350 messages in the time-nuts folder since it was archived at the end of 2010. I used Find for 5680 and got 900 messages,

Re: [time-nuts] New Rubidium Frequency Standard Group

2012-02-02 Thread EWKehren
My frustration is that there is very little information or discussion as to the performance of the device, ultimately some may want to use it in their shop as thee reference, and to make that possible more performance data would be nice. It may be the best they have. Bert Kehren In a