I could not figure if the Resolution-T (or Mini-T) provides carrier phase
data.
I would guess not. The manual with TSIP commands is at:
http://www.trimble.com/tmg_resolutiont_ts.asp
Looks like it reports code phase in units of 1/16 chip.
What were your plans if it had carrier phase?
I do
I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS
receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the
local Trimble rep.
In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare board) is $75, and the
Mini-T (which is a complete embedded GPSDO on a PWB) is $945.
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
Didier KO4BB
Didier Juges wrote:
I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS
receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the
local Trimble rep.
In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare
Didier Juges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you need the very small form factor and low power consumption,
and unless the performance (so far, data is unavailable, I have asked
for Allan Variance data) is outstanding, the Fury is a better deal, in
my opinion.
What's the street price of a
Didier Juges wrote:
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
Didier KO4BB
Didier
Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical?
Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify that the timing error
is stochastic.
Bruce
I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS
receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the
local Trimble rep.
In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare board) is $75, and the
Mini-T (which is a complete embedded GPSDO on a PWB) is
Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Didier Juges wrote:
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
Didier KO4BB
Didier
Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical?
Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify that the timing error
is stochastic.
In a message dated 5/21/2007 17:59:43 Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didier Juges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you need the very small form factor and low power consumption,
and unless the performance (so far, data is unavailable, I have asked
for Allan Variance
Didier Juges wrote:
Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Didier Juges wrote:
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
Didier KO4BB
Didier
Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical?
Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify
