Arrgh!
Mike S wrote:
At 07:17 PM 7/29/2009, Rex wrote...
Your email posting style makes it very difficult to follow threads
where you have posted replies.
At least he's not top-posting.
I did say this:
"I don't want to start a big netiqette discussion..."
Top/bottom is exactly the dis
At 07:17 PM 7/29/2009, Rex wrote...
Your email posting style makes it very difficult to follow threads
where you have posted replies.
At least he's not top-posting.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://ww
> -Original Message-
> From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Rex
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:18 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Posting style Was: looking for
al Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf
Of Rex
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Posting style Was: looking for good
description/generalized model for time adjustme
James,
Your email posting style makes it very difficult to follow threads where
you have posted replies.
Most mail reader programs follow the convention, that on a reply, they
automatically start with a header that identifies the last poster ("In
reply to message from xxx") and then "quote"
