Re: [time-nuts] Range of Sawtooth values?

2014-03-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you watch long enough and know the clock frequency, you will find corrections over the entire period of the clock. In most modules that shows up as a +/- 1/2 clock period correction. Bob On Mar 10, 2014, at 2:03 AM, Hal Murray wrote: > > albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: >> The M12 user

Re: [time-nuts] Range of Sawtooth values?

2014-03-09 Thread Hal Murray
albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: > The M12 user manual hints at why, they say the newer receiver runs on a > faster internal clock. Roughly, it's going to be within 1/2 clock cycle. If newer units have faster clocks, the peak-peak sawtooth should be smaller. -- These are my opinions. I hate

Re: [time-nuts] Range of Sawtooth values?

2014-03-09 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Jim Miller wrote: > Just curious as to the range of sawtooth values that are typical for timing > receivers. > > What's the maximum correction needed? I just recently looked at this at least for the Oncore series of receivers. The magnitude of the sawtooth seems

Re: [time-nuts] Range of Sawtooth values?

2014-03-09 Thread Tom Van Baak
> Just curious as to the range of sawtooth values that are typical for timing > receivers. > > What's the maximum correction needed? > > Thanks > > jim ab3cv It depends very much on the receiver. It's easy to measure, though. http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2005-April/018114.html http:

[time-nuts] Range of Sawtooth values?

2014-03-09 Thread Jim Miller
Just curious as to the range of sawtooth values that are typical for timing receivers. What's the maximum correction needed? Thanks jim ab3cv ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/li