Re: [time-nuts] Sawtooth correction with a slower TIC

2007-07-21 Thread Richard H McCorkle
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom, That version was done a few years back when I was big on recycling parts, so let me dig through my junkbox and see if I still have one around. Richard ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am

[time-nuts] Sawtooth correction with a slower TIC

2007-07-20 Thread Richard H McCorkle
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentlemen, I would like to pose a theory question and see if my thinking is faulty. My original design used a 50 MHz TIC clock and the TMR0 prescaler as the phase counter giving 20ns single sample resolution in the prototype system.

Re: [time-nuts] Sawtooth correction with a slower TIC

2007-07-20 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard H McCorkle wrote: Gentlemen, I would like to pose a theory question and see if my thinking is faulty. My original design used a 50 MHz TIC clock and the TMR0 prescaler as the phase counter giving 20ns single sample