Matt,
It's not easy to see but if you look at the 72h plot, you can see that
the EFC voltage stops at a low value before the event and then
continues at a higher voltage after it. Look at the EFC level values
before and after.
This is the first time I've seen anything of the magnitude on the
Sorry, my bad, the links on traces 2-4 are incorrect.
I've been a little lax in keeping my eye on the baby for over a day
but was astonished to see the display on GPSCon just a few minutes
ago. Things are usually very predictable with my EFC voltage showing a
linear downward slope but I was
Seems that things have started to return to some normality but
variations in the EFC are very high. The status line from the unit as
reported shows everything is OK and it's tracking 7 sats.
Trace of proceeding 60h from current time 1st Feb 10:30 UTC
I've seen similar results when the receiver switches satellites.
Multipath??
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:43:01 +1300, Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seems that things have started to return to some normality but
variations in the EFC are very high. The status line from the unit as
reported
On 2 February 2010 11:11, Matt Osborn kc0...@msosborn.com wrote:
I've seen similar results when the receiver switches satellites.
Multipath??
It does that all the time as sats come in and out of view but I've
never seen an event of this magnitude before. If you look at the trace
for the
Steve,
I'm much more wizened than wise, but my understanding is that crystal
jumps do not come back. They stay at their new frequency. I did
notice on your graph of the event that there were changes in the sat.
constellation at the beginning and end of the anomaly.
I've seen similar moves on
