employers
apparently have several lawyers with nothing important to do
regards,
Paul G8GJA
-Original Message-
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 October 2008 15:17
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sulzer Labs
Mike Monett wrote:
Steve Rooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the obvious one is Thunderbird which will do all the things
that I can see that Pimmy can do, given my albeit brief overview
of this application from the parent website.
I tried Thunderbird some time ago, but I
One of the advantages of top posting - you can reply to the message
and ignore the rubbish at the bottom
Did you forget the smiley? :)
If the bottom is rubbish, why send it?
Ignoring it only works if everybody knows that the convention is to only
top-post and not insert anything in the
Of Hal Murray
Sent: 11 October 2008 07:20
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sulzer Labs D-5 oscillator
One of the advantages of top posting - you can reply to the message
and ignore the rubbish at the bottom
Did you forget the smiley
Rob Kimberley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The smiley (humour) was implied.
I didn't mean any offence, but have been used to top posting, as
business email (that's what I originally got my email for
originally back in the mid 90's) was all (and still is) top
Mike Monett wrote:
Steve Rooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can use Linux and not worry about any of this :)
And I personally think that Rob has been unfairly taken to task
over a comment about the verbiage added to emails sent from some
corporate systems which add
Mike Monett wrote:
There is a very big difference between a business email and a
forum.
A business email is usually between two people and concerns only
one
subject. The exchange is usually very short, perhaps a
single
question and a single
] Sulzer Labs D-5 oscillator
This group seems pretty flexible about -- top -- mid -- or
bottom -- posting.
Don't see any reason to lecture this group about how they
might want to communicate.
I never paid attention about how it was being done, but it
all seems to work here. I never can
2008/10/11 Mike Monett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob Kimberley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The smiley (humour) was implied.
I didn't mean any offence, but have been used to top posting, as
business email (that's what I originally got my email for
originally back in the mid
This group seems pretty flexible about -- top -- mid -- or bottom --
posting.
Don't see any reason to lecture this group about how they might want to
communicate.
I never paid attention about how it was being done, but it all seems to
work here. I never can remember having any thought about
Steve Rooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can use Linux and not worry about any of this :)
And I personally think that Rob has been unfairly taken to task
over a comment about the verbiage added to emails sent from some
corporate systems which add huge disclaimers to the
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rob Kimberley [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It was only when I ventured into newsgroups that I came across bottom
posting, which to me seemed totally illogical. I've read the pros of bottom
posting (and the cons of top posting), but still can't get my head or my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rob Kimberley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It was only when I ventured into newsgroups that I came across bottom
posting, which to me seemed totally illogical. I've read the pros of
bottom posting (and the cons of top posting), but
Didier Juges wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rob Kimberley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It was only when I ventured into newsgroups that I came across
bottom posting, which to me seemed totally illogical. I've read the
pros of bottom posting (and the cons of
Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rob Kimberley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It was only when I ventured into newsgroups that I came across bottom
posting, which to me seemed totally illogical. I've read the pros of
bottom posting (and the cons of top posting), but still
Paul,
Did you get what you needed? If the schematic at:
http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/sul25bcl.gif
isn't clear enough, let me know. I have a full set of Sulzer
2.5 and 5 manuals here somewhere.
/tvb
I need a bit of help getting an old Sulzer D-5 5MHz oscillator to work. It
was
Mike,
I'm in the process of switching over to Ubuntu, and I already
checked - Wine handles Pimmy.
Whilst Wine is a very useful utility, I would only use it if there is
an absolute need to run a Windows application whith no equivalent. If
you are switching to Linux, you really would be
Steve Rooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I'm in the process of switching over to Ubuntu, and I already
checked - Wine handles Pimmy.
Whilst Wine is a very useful utility, I would only use it if there
is an absolute need to run a Windows application whith no
Hi Mike,
2008/10/12 Mike Monett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have been running Eagle pcb cad on Suse since 2001. I am extremely
happy with linux. But LTspice requires Wine, Pimmy will run on it,
and also Hotkeyz. This will tide me over until I can find
replacements, but LTspice will
Hi all,
I need a bit of help getting an old Sulzer D-5 5MHz oscillator to work. It
was built into a rack module with monitoring facilities and had been
slightly 'got-at' by the previous owner. Some of the connections were
pencilled on the case but not enough to give confidence about powering it
Paul can you send me a photo of your oscillator?
Cheers
Rob Kimberley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Rooke
Sent: 10 October 2008 08:37
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sulzer Labs
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Rooke
Sent: 10 October 2008 08:37
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sulzer Labs D-5 oscillator
2008/10/10 Reeves Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I need a bit of help getting an old Sulzer D-5
Hi all,
I need a bit of help getting an old Sulzer D-5 5MHz oscillator to work. It
was built into a rack module with monitoring facilities and had been
slightly 'got-at' by the previous owner. Some of the connections were
pencilled on the case but not enough to give confidence about
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sulzer Labs D-5 oscillator
2008/10/10 Reeves Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I need a bit of help getting an old Sulzer D-5 5MHz oscillator to
work. It was built into a rack module with monitoring facilities and
had been slightly 'got
24 matches
Mail list logo
