Robert Vassar wrote:
Solaris has some pretty useful timing/timekeeping API's. You might
want to consider OpenSolaris, it's not quite BSD free, but the CDDL
is OSI approved. For some reason or another, Sun continues to use a
3.x derived NTP daemon. I know the maintainer. It's been a
On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Magne Mæhre wrote:
Robert Vassar wrote:
Solaris has some pretty useful timing/timekeeping API's. You might
want to consider OpenSolaris, it's not quite BSD free, but the CDDL
is OSI approved. For some reason or another, Sun continues to use a
3.x derived NTP
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first choice is my Sun Blade 100 as it is small, quiet, doesn't use...
last time I looked at a dmesg from one of those, it looked just like
my old hp laptop... but an ultrasparc cpu.
unless OpenBSD happens to have
Quoth Chris Kuethe at 2008-03-16 19:25...
if nothing else, can we get you to try it for a week and document just
how awful it is? (more than 5000ppm?)
OK, I'll do it. Won't hurt to wipe that machine down anyway - it can do
its current duties just as well with BSD as it can with Solaris.
Solaris has some pretty useful timing/timekeeping API's. You might
want to consider OpenSolaris, it's not quite BSD free, but the CDDL
is OSI approved. For some reason or another, Sun continues to use a
3.x derived NTP daemon. I know the maintainer. It's been a few
years since I
Matthew Smith wrote:
I have shelved the idea of building my time server with a single board
PC for the time being - putting together a case, PSU, etc., and doing
an install with no monitor (would have to make an adapter) is just too
much like hard work.
You can buy an assembled SBC in one
Hi Folks
I have shelved the idea of building my time server with a single board
PC for the time being - putting together a case, PSU, etc., and doing an
install with no monitor (would have to make an adapter) is just too much
like hard work.
I have a choice of a couple of Ultrasparc boxes
