Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-15 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi > On Feb 15, 2018, at 9:03 AM, jimlux wrote: > > On 2/14/18 6:51 PM, Tim Lister wrote: >> On Feb 14, 2018 19:47, "Chris Caudle" wrote: >> On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: >>> At substantially more expense, and with an experimental

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-15 Thread jimlux
On 2/14/18 6:51 PM, Tim Lister wrote: On Feb 14, 2018 19:47, "Chris Caudle" wrote: On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: At substantially more expense, and with an experimental lattice clock, Does that schematic figure in the paper imply that the

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-15 Thread jimlux
On 2/14/18 6:46 PM, Chris Caudle wrote: On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: At substantially more expense, and with an experimental lattice clock, Does that schematic figure in the paper imply that the "transportable" strontium and ytterbium clocks are built into trailers instead

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-15 Thread Scott McGrath
Well it will fit in a C-130 or any commercial cargo plane by the looks of the trailer.So it could be a flying clock. Content by Scott Typos by Siri On Feb 15, 2018, at 1:02 AM, Michael Wouters wrote: Sorry, missed the last character in the URL:

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-14 Thread Michael Wouters
Sorry, missed the last character in the URL: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.073601 On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 4:42 pm, Michael Wouters wrote: > There's a photo here: > > https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.07360 >

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-14 Thread Michael Wouters
There's a photo here: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.07360 Cheers Michael On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 1:47 pm, Chris Caudle wrote: > On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: > > At substantially more expense, and with an experimental

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-14 Thread Tim Lister
On Feb 14, 2018 19:47, "Chris Caudle" wrote: On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: > At substantially more expense, and with an experimental lattice clock, Does that schematic figure in the paper imply that the "transportable" strontium and ytterbium clocks are

Re: [time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-14 Thread Chris Caudle
On Wed, February 14, 2018 7:06 pm, jimlux wrote: > At substantially more expense, and with an experimental lattice clock, Does that schematic figure in the paper imply that the "transportable" strontium and ytterbium clocks are built into trailers instead of the traditional rack enclosure?

[time-nuts] Team of physicists repeats tvb Project GREAT

2018-02-14 Thread jimlux
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-017-0042-3 At substantially more expense, and with an experimental lattice clock, and a lot more references.. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to