Re: [time-nuts] Tight PLL method. Is it good enough?

2010-06-06 Thread Steve Rooke
On 5 June 2010 09:48, John Green wpxs...@gmail.com wrote: I am a relative outsider to this fine group. I mostly just read the posts. I have learned a lot since I have subscribed. So, I don't have a dog in the fight over whether the tight PLL method is all Warren says it is. I can understand

Re: [time-nuts] Tight PLL method. Is it good enough?

2010-06-04 Thread John Green
I am a relative outsider to this fine group. I mostly just read the posts. I have learned a lot since I have subscribed. So, I don't have a dog in the fight over whether the tight PLL method is all Warren says it is. I can understand that Warren has researched this method, discovered its weakness

Re: [time-nuts] Tight PLL method. Is it good enough?

2010-06-04 Thread Bob Camp
Hi What do you want to test? What do you want to do with the results? What are you going to compare them against? What range of measurements are you interested in? The DMTD will look at two atomic clocks on the same frequency and the reference drops out in the processing. Is that important